MIT-WPU, Pune Faculty Details & Reviews ,Kothrud, Pune

Faculty: Faculty-wise, it is good. Teachers are well-qualified. They have good knowledge of the subjects. However, most of them do not take the job seriously or teach in depth. The curriculum is changed every year according to market trends. In terms of exams, there are FAT 1, FAT 2, mid-term, and end-term examinations.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and well qualified, but yes, some are qualified but aren't that knowledgeable. The curriculum is 100% relevant. It does make one industry-ready. The exams are quite difficult, and you really need to study the core concepts to understand everything. 

Faculty: Exams are moderately set, you need to start studying 1 week before the exam in order to score good marks. There are 2 written exams per semester. One is mid term and another is end term. Passing percentage is around 40%. Subjects are upto date with all kinds of things like AI/ML, which makes students industry ready.

Faculty: Teachers are highly educated, and the teaching is very valuable. It does help a lot in shaping us. Exams are very easy to moderate, and the pass percentage is 4 or 5 CGPA. It's a wonderful college, it taught us various things in the first year itself, from making movies to operations.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful. They will help us solve doubts regularly. The course curriculum is perfectly aligned with the industry demands. Subjects are interesting, and some side subjects are also introduced for relation, like pace and yoga. Semester exams are moderate, and papers are set according to what is taught in class.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, but in our department, there is a lot of communication between the faculty. They literally tell us today's to-do list before 1 hour before the college starts. Also, most of the lectures get cancelled, even exams get cancelled, and they don't even let us know unless we contact them.

Faculty: Faculty members are not very nice since they are language-based. Some teachers keep targeting students unnecessarily and give internals not based on marks but on their moods. Teaching quality is not good since some teachers just read from the slides, and even the PPTs are not good. It has less information, and they show it in a small font.

Faculty: They are at a good level of difficulty quite challenging. Again, the students who never attend the college can pass the exams by copying. I have seen students wearing iWatches and getting passed with no effort taken by faculty members to take action.

Faculty: The faculty is okay. I would say all of them are more than qualified, but not all are qualified to teach. However, they are very helpful, and they're always there when the students need them. They are generally motivating, and they do teach well. They can also be quite strict and considerate with attendance sometimes.

Faculty: I would rate 50 out of 50 for teacher's teaching quality. Some teachers are good and knowledgeable, and some are qualified to be in the education sector. Teachers focus more on moral policing and not on education. Students are treated like school children. The course curriculum always requires a master's degree for a decent job. Faculty members do not do enough to ensure we are industry-ready. Semester exams are of a medium difficulty level. The pass percentage is 80 percent.

Faculty: Teachers are really qualified and helpful. They will guide you very well in one-on-one sessions. They will share their knowledge and their contacts with you. The course is very good. Till now, we have got lots and lots of opportunities for internships, event management opportunities, and information. All of the semester exams are really workable if you attend classes regularly. They explain the topic by video, PPT, and sometimes even by discussing and taking case studies.

Faculty: Teachers are very qualified (almost everyone holds a Ph.D, and those who are genuinely looking for quality education can take admission. The problem I notice is in the management of the whole semester. Communication is not transparent, and if anyone has a problem, he/she will be passed around from one building to another, and the problem will rarely be solved.

Faculty: The faculty in my course are generally well-qualified. Most teachers are supportive when it comes to clearing doubts. Semester exams are very easy to clear if you study for at least 30 min or 1 hour a day. The curriculum is updated as per industry requirements, with workshops every month. .

Faculty: Teachers in the department are generally helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. Most hold M.Teach/PhD degrees. The curriculum is industry-relevant. It includes cybersecurity tools, digital forensics, networking, cloud, AI basics, and hands-on labs. Semester exams moderate not very difficult if you attend classes and study regularly. Questions are usually from the taught syllabus. Around 80-90% clear the exams.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful well qualified and knowledgeable. I am not ready for the industry because I am in my first year. My semester exam did not happen that is why I do not know about the examination. Some class tests and internal tests happened. They are easy and some are also hard.