College of Engineering, Pune Faculty Details & Reviews ,Shivaji Nagar

Faculty: Most teachers are helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. They explain concepts well enough. I won't say they are at the IIT level, not to compare, but they are decent enough. The curriculum till now is not department-specific, as it involves many other engineering subjects unrelated to CSE. However, from the 3rd year onward, the subjects become highly relevant and depth-specific. I'd rate the difficulty of the college exams around 6 to 7 out of 10. I'm not sure about the passing percentage. The ...

Faculty: Faculty members are really supportive and help when students reach out. The course curriculum is amazing, and I get to do fun stuff alongside my degree. The course curriculum is flexible and really helpful for industrial challenges for students. Not only that, but all the extra sessions held also help students a lot.

Faculty: Teachers are not that good at teaching. Some teachers are not even that knowledgeable. Teaching quality is average. The course curriculum is not that relevant except for some subjects. It does not make students industry-ready. Semester exams are pretty difficult in college. The passing percentage is around 30/100 in every subject.

Faculty: CoEP faculty are experienced and supportive. Curriculum is relevant and well-structured. Exams are moderately difficult and concept-based. The pass percentile is depends on overall students. First of all, they take the average marks of all, the lowest, and the highest, and then they take the passing marks.

Faculty: Teachers are all highly experienced and the best in their fields which always helps in any problem. Most of the curriculum is real-life based hence a lot of help. The exams are quite tough but also strict and useful. Even after the previous year questions are provided in libraries it is still challenging to study the pattern hence a surprise test.

Faculty: The teachers are helpful, very qualified, and knowledgeable. The teaching quality is also very good except some teachers. The course is NEP-based and pretty relevant according to me just lacks a bit of practical exposure. They are pretty difficult and for passing there is a relatively lenient grading system in which the passing goes around 40 percent marks.

Faculty: Teachers are well-qualified and knowledgeable. The teaching quality depends on the style of the teachers. Personally, I feel most of the teachers have great knowledge about subjects they are teaching. The course curriculum is relevant according to seniors. It does not make students industry-ready, but it gives them basics of that. Semester exams are not that difficult. Faculty members in our college have diverse mindsets. Some teachers are strict, some are very helpful, and some are very good at...

Faculty: Teachers are decent. There is a party between new and old faculty members. Some of them have good teaching skills, while some lack English speaking skills, but all the faculty members really encourage students in research and academics. I mean, they are qualified enough to teach us, but they lack experience. All of them are really supportive of curiosity. The course curriculum is relevant enough, and there are regular changes in the curriculum. The latest curriculum is aligned with NEP guideline...

Faculty: The syllabus is quite tough, teachers are somewhat helpful, but you have to go through many resources like YouTube videos, reference books, and so on. Examination is strict with proper evaluation and scrutiny. There are mostly midterms, teachers assessment and end-of-semester exams.

Faculty: Being autonomous, they have enacted a choice-based credit system from academic year 25-26 onwards, where students choose the subjects that they like from the given set. This really helps to avoid nightmares like engineering graphics and choose an easy but necessary subject like Python or C.

Faculty: All of the students are qualified. Most of the teachers are helpful and knowledgeable. Some of the teachers really love their subjects and explain them very beautifully. Computer Engineering is a very relevant curriculum, and it makes students industry-ready. Almost 90% pass the semester exams, and the exams are moderately difficult.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, but some explanations can be confusing, and understanding depends on individual effort. The curriculum is relevant from the second year onwards. While the first year does not have much relevance to the specific stream. Semester exams are not very difficult to pass. The passing marks range from a minimum of 30 to a maximum of 40 out of 100.

Faculty: The faculty are helpful and knowledgeable, and the teaching quality is good. The curriculum is relevant and helps in building industry-ready skills. Semester exams are moderate, not too hard. If you study regularly, the pass percentage is usually good. Semester exams are manageable if you attend lectures and are on time. The pass percentage is good because the teachers guide you well.

Faculty: The new CBCS system has made it really easy for the student to choose subjects according to their will. Now students from any branch can select their desired course apart from the compulsory subjects. The exam environment is also very well distributed and cool.

Faculty: Teachers are highly compatible and are Ph.D. holders with great knowledge. They are very helpful, and the quality of teaching is good. Curriculum is unique due to the autonomous nature of the college, and its syllabus produces industry-ready individuals. Semester exams are not difficult, but need revision and practice at least 3 weeks before the exam. Pass percentage is 90%.