Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Rohini, Delhi

Faculty: Most teachers at MAIT are qualified and genuinely helpful, especially in the CSE department, where many of them explain concepts clearly and support students during labs, though the teaching quality can feel uneven because a few teachers still follow old-school, theory-heavy methods. The curriculum is decent and covers the fundamentals well, but it doesn't make you fully industry-ready on its own. You definitely need to put in extra effort through projects, coding practice, and internships. Seme...

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and knowledgeable, but students are so chill here that they don't want to study. Exams are lenient and good, and in practicals, we get good marks. The course curriculum is relevant because we have new software in our syllabus, like CAD, automation, etc.

Faculty: The faculty at MAIT are highly qualified, with many holding PhDs or actively pursuing them, and possessing significant teaching experience. The institute strives to provide quality education and training. The curriculum is designed to be relevant and cater to industry demands, aiming to make students industry-ready. Courses cover fundamental principles and recent advancements in various fields. The institution is known for its high-class education. The exams are easy and of a low level, focusing...

Faculty: My department teachers try to ensure that students grasp the concept rather than teaching just for the sake of it unlike many other colleges. Exceptions do exist everywhere. The curriculum follows the one designed by GGSIPU University. I feel that it needs updation now and many new subjects can be added and irrelevant subjects or topics can be specifically can be removed. Semester exams are of easy to medium level and can be managed easily with a few days of prep.

Faculty: Teachers are well qualified and knowledgeable. Teaching quality is also good. Course curriculum is relevant at the industrial level. Semester exams are not very difficult here. 40% is the pass percentage. During semester exams, you just have to study for 1 week before exams, and you are all set.

Faculty: There are three exams in each semester. Two are mid-semester exams, and one is the end-of-semester exam. The mid-semester exams are of 30 marks, the end-of-semester exams are of 60 marks, and 40 marks are internal based on your lab performance and mid-semester marks.

Faculty: Teachers are highly qualified and are pretty good nature-wise if you attend their classes. I would suggest you have good communication with the teachers so that afterwards you can get internal marks and they will help you in the long run. The curriculum in the first year, I think, is not relevant because it is all related to 12th stuff.

Faculty: Faculty members are qualified but teaching quality is average. Some teachers are helpful. Curriculum follows IPU, somewhat outdated, not fully industry-ready. Exams are moderate, mostly theory-based, with a high pass percentage of around 80-90%. Exams are based on GSSIPU University.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful and supportive, especially the lab faculty. They are all Ph.D. holders so very knowledgeable and great teachers. The curriculum is very relevant and makes students ready for real-life situations in the future, especially the lab period, which helps in understanding and prepares them for what can happen in the real world. Semester exams in the college are not very difficult, and mostly moderate in difficulty level. The pass percentage is around 30% and varies from exam t...

Faculty: I find my faculty to be very good genuinely. They teach too nicely, and the content delivered is of top quality. I feel like they should have involved more coding classes in the first year. Semester exams are moderate, not too tough neither too easy while mid-semester exams are quite easy.

Faculty: You can meet pretty good teachers here, they are totally qualified as teachers, but you will have to put effort into it too to do something with the knowledge. The teaching and knowledge don't make you industry-ready, you have to do some self-grind Semester exams are, I would say, at an average level you can pass if you pay attention to the class.

Faculty: Some teachers are pretty cool and good but some are just miserable so just beware. Faculty members are overall good, and attendance is pretty lenient from what I have heard from seniors. Even some teachers told us that you have time to do other stuff also.

Faculty: Teachers are very decent, not much interaction, just completing the course, and no matter whether the students understand the concept or not. The curriculum is, however, the same as that of almost every college in India. Though teachers are usually strict and do not stretch the deadline for attendance, they may even extend the date for submission of assignments and other materials.

Faculty: Faculty members are friendly and helpful in nature and help in solving doubts and give proper guidance when students need. All the teachers are well-qualified and have great teaching skills. Paper system and pattern are very good. There are two midterms in college, and the final end-of-term exams are done in other colleges so that student can feel the pressure and have a greater opportunity to explore and give their best.

Faculty: Teachers of the college are highly qualified. All the teachers have extensive knowledge, but the curriculum needs some changes. As technology is growing very fast, there should be subjects like AIML introduced in early semesters. Semester exams are not very tough, and the pass percentage is 40%.