Maharaja Surajmal Institute of Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Janakpuri, Delhi

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and qualified but the teaching style is too old-fashioned. The subject is not making any student for industry-ready and the teachers also are not teaching in that style. The exam is held at regular intervals of time with passing marks of 12 in both mid-semester exams.

Faculty: Teachers are always helpful but you have to create a good image in front of teachers. Teachers are highly qualified. The course curriculum is relevant. Semester exams are easy to moderate. 40 marks are internal and 60 marks are external marks. You have to score 40 marks total from both external and internal.

Faculty: Please keep in mind that courses were outdated and old, well-established to create mouse rat, software engineer. The quality of teaching was decent, I must say.

Faculty: Teachers are chill, mostly, but not all of them. Very few teachers, or almost none, know how to teach as they do not have enough knowledge of their subjects. The course curriculum itself is the same as that of the normal IPU colleges and not too updated. We have to develop skills on our own to get placed, so we should not focus on the course curriculum much. Semester exams are easy enough. Mid-semester exams don't matter much. End-semester exams are also not that tough if we study when they are ...

Faculty: Many assignments are given. Teachers do teach their subjects effectively, but internal marks are given randomly, not based on mid-semester marks or attendance. Marks are often given according to a student’s ability to impress the teacher.

Faculty: Teachers here are helpful, knowledgeable, qualified, and nice, except for a few teachers. Semester exams are easily scorable and never too difficult (33% passing criteria). The course curriculum is relevant, and the subjects do help you in your advanced career choices.

Faculty: The best part of MSIT is its academics. Teachers are knowledgeable and supportive. The teaching quality is good for almost all teachers, but some have limited knowledge. They are not able to explain it to students. Lab assistants are also helpful. Mid-term is easy, and we can easily score in it. End-semester exam is also not too hard because of the options, but questions are of a good level. The main problem is that they are still teaching DSA in C, so it is somehow difficult to handle C for col...

Faculty: Faculty members are good and knowledgeable. The college is affiliated with GGSIPU, so the curriculum is also good. Exams are usually just mid-semester (twice) and the semester exams. The course is relevant to the needs which are required by the recruiters. We can gain good skills from our college itself.

Faculty: Teachers are some okay, some very bad. Curriculum based on IP University. Exam checking is loose; long paragraphs mean more marks. Hard checking pressures the student for deeper study so that students will understand things more clearly because of the fear of passing.

Faculty: The curriculum is similar to most colleges and follows the IPU syllabus, which is not very industry-oriented. It focuses more on theory than practical, job-ready skills. The teachers are decent overall; some are supportive and helpful, while others are average. Semester exams are manageable and not very difficult, with a passing requirement of around 40 percent.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful, they are qualified and have deep knowledge about their subjects. The teaching quality is great. The course curriculum is totally irrelevant and does not make the students industry-ready. The semester exams are very easy, and the passing percentage is 40.

Faculty: Teachers teach well and no classes get cancelled. Teachers do their job sincerely and come on time to class. The course curriculum is relevant and makes students ready for the industry, and opportunities are there. Overall, it is average, and most students pass.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and qualified, but not that knowledgeable. Teaching quality is okay, the course curriculum is relevant, and it makes students industry-ready. Passing the exam is very easy, checking marks are very easy, and you can easily score well just by learning the night before.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and qualified, but not that knowledgeable, and some of them hold grudges with students for no reason. Overall, teaching is average, not that good. The course is relevant to the curriculum. Semester exams are not difficult and can be easily passed by studying even the night before.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful. They help you and genuinely understand your concerns. The curriculum is up to date and better than most universities, and it is very relevant. The semester exams are not very hard, and they are curriculum-relevant and easy to pass, as only 40 out of 100 marks are required to pass.