Pondicherry University Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: All are prepared well with the NEP guidelines, so it is flexible and calming to learn more. Exams are good and based entirely on the syllabus. Our curriculum is truly relevant to current affairs. We study Science, Maths, Computer Graphics, and Python.

Faculty: We follow the CBME curriculum in our college, and exams are conducted by Pondicherry University. The curriculum is very standard, and we have the most helpful and super-friendly staff who are from JIPMER, AIIMS, and many top universities. They are very helpful and super cool. Yearly, we have only one university exam, which consists of very standard questions, and the pass percentage is the 60-40 rule.

Faculty: The teachers are helpful, qualified, and well-knowledgeable. The teaching quality of teachers is very good. The course curriculum is relevant, and this makes students industry-ready. The semester exam is not too tough but moderate. The passing percentage is 88 percent.

Faculty: Teachers are extra qualified. They teach things that make us understand and help us. The curriculum is relevant and it is based on improving skills and talents of students. The semesters are not very difficult and have average passing percentage.

Faculty: In my department, teachers are really helpful, and some teachers teach really well. Teachers are well qualified, holding a Ph.D. degree and a good research background. This course does not make you ready for corporate jobs; you can only think about research sectors. For corporate jobs, we need to develop skills on our own. Exams are not too difficult; they are moderate if you follow proper class notes. The pass percentage of students in one attempt is 90 percent, and the passing mark is 40.

Faculty: Faculty members were good. They were highly educated and experienced. The course was unique and good. Teachers use simple language that was easy to understand. There were two semesters in a year. There were presentations and journals in each semester.

Faculty: Faculty members were good. They were highly educated and experienced. They were aware of what the students wanted. They used simple language that was easy to understand. The course was unique which is M.Tech in Database. This was part of Cybersecurity. There were two semesters in a year which were conducted by the college.

Faculty: Faculty members were good. They were highly educated and experienced. They cleared our doubts through discussions. The course was slightly different and unique. There were 2 semesters in a year, and each semester had two sessionals. There were many presentations and journals in this course.

Faculty: Faculty members were good. They were highly educated and experienced. They all did their Master's and Ph.Ds. The course was good, it makes students ready to explore a new world. There were two semesters in a year, and each semester had two sessions, which were conducted by the college. Each semester had presentations and assignments.

Faculty: Faculty members are good. They are highly aware of what the students want. They are highly educated and experienced. The course is slightly old. There are two semesters in a year, and each semester has two sessions, which are conducted by the college.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and understand the difficulty of students and help them. They also help us to gain confidence and help out the students who are poor. The curriculum is relevant in the present society. The semester exams are not much tough nor easy. 40 percent is the pass percentage

Faculty: Most of the faculty members are knowledgeable and approachable, but some of the professors are not that knowledgeable, in my opinion. The college should be concerned about this and improve it to provide good, knowledgeable teachers. The pass percentage is mostly positive.

Faculty: The teachers are good, and they are well educated, but their teaching is quite outdated. The syllabus is not so relevant as it depends upon the university, but now it’s changed, and they are keeping it good. The semester is easy, and the pass percentage is 95 percent.

Faculty: Faculty members were good. They were highly educated and experienced. They all had done their masters and Ph.D. The course was slightly unique and good. There were two semesters in a year. Each semester had two sessionals which were conducted by the college. In each semester, there were minimum of 30 experiments done on food analysis of different foods and beverages.

Faculty: Every faculty member is very well educated. Every faculty member has a Ph.D., and for every faculty member, there is a Ph.D. scholar. Sometimes Ph.D. scholars teach instead of faculty members. For each student, there is a faculty advisor. So if we have any kind of issue, we can meet them. They will help.