RTU KOTA Faculty Details & Reviews ,Kota

Faculty: As I am a first-year student at Global Institute of Technology in B.Tech in Computer Science engineering core branch, I would say I am totally satisfied with the teachers and their knowledge. The quality of the teaching and the curriculum is very relevant from an exam point of view and the practical knowledge they are providing to all the students will make them ready for the market and for the job, as we all know that B.Tech is a course in which there are a lot of difficulties, but not here.

Faculty: Teachers are very qualified, good, and caring towards the students. They personally know every student who learns from them. There are different courses which can be pursued to make a career in different fields. Also, the college is affiliated with RTU Kota. All the exams are conducted through them. So, overall, the difficulty level is moderate. Around 7 CGPA is a good grade to achieve the goals.

Faculty: Teachers are excellent and very helpful. They are well educated and qualified in their fields. Some of them also have Ph.D. degrees in their fields. Their teaching quality is the best. The course curriculum is also relevant. It makes the students industry-ready. The semester exams are quite tough. Around 70% of students pass.

Faculty: The college faculty is very good and helpful. They are well qualified in their fields, and some are Ph.D. holders as well. They have very deep knowledge in their fields. The teaching quality is excellent. The course curriculum is very relevant. It makes the students industry-ready, but not that much. My senior tells me that the semester exams are not that tough. 80–85% of students pass every year.

Faculty: Most of the teachers were helpful, but some were arrogant in nature, and their way of talking was bad. Semester exams were moderate. Most teachers were well-qualified and knowledgeable. All high-ranked professors, deans, and HODs were well-qualified and had good knowledge. The class teachers were also very good.

Faculty: Faculty was known as a knowledge hub for students. If any doubt arose, the teaching staff was always helpful to students. They were very qualified and knowledgeable. Their teaching experience was also good. They explained the topics with practical sessions. Overall, faculty and teachers' teaching quality was good. The course curriculum was relevant. However, students also needed to improve their skills according to the job description to become industry-ready. Semester examinations were not diff...

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and qualified. They help students, but some are very bad and have low patience. They teach students well and help them grow in their field. College exams are moderate, but you need to study hard for good internal marks. Maintain 75% attendance.

Faculty: Teachers are very qualified. Some have a Ph.D. and some are pursuing one. The college will become an autonomous institution by 2025, but I am from the 2024 batch, so I am not under the autonomous system. The exam system is 2 mid-terms and 1 end-term. 75 percent attendance is strictly enforced. Semesters are easy.

Faculty: Faculty members are nice. They are experienced, helpful, and knowledgeable. They explain the topics clearly. They are supportive whenever students have doubts. The course curriculum is relevant and covers important subjects and topics required for academics.

Faculty: Most faculty members are guest faculty. The teaching quality is very poor. Very few internal marks are given by teachers. There are no external activities and no proper placement support. The teaching quality is poor, and there are no classes and labs on time. No one seems to care about the students in this college.

Faculty: Teachers are qualified, helpful, and knowledgeable. Every teacher is knowledgeable. The teaching qualities are good. The semester exams are difficult because they are conducted by RTU, Kotak, and they make the exam paper tough, so we can say it is a little bit tough.

Faculty: Teachers were really qualified and knowledgeable. I would say the course was a little outdated, but it was good. Students had to put in extra effort and learn skills to succeed, which was necessary anywhere. After all, students became ready for the industry. They took us on frequent industry visits. The ICI student chapter was a club that really helped students grow. The semester exams were not that tough. If students studied the syllabus completely, they could score amazing marks.

Faculty: Faculty members and student handling in this institute are good and are highly skilled. Faculty provide students a better future to secure their future while preparing them for various types of courses and curriculum. A wide range of courses like B.A., B.Sc., B.Tech, and Master's professional courses are provided. Courses are in a very wide range, and it provides different streams of courses.

Faculty: Teachers and faculty are good. Not all, but they are nice and humble, except for 2–3. I must say that with this amount of money and the quality of faculty, it is good because they are helpful. They guide you and stick with you whenever you need them.

Faculty: Most of the faculty in this college is pretty decent and frank with students. Some teachers are not good they are qualified yet they are unable to teach them. The curriculum is also good it makes you industry-ready. After studying an undergraduate course for four years, the examination level is somewhere between moderate and hard.