RTU KOTA Faculty Details & Reviews ,Kota

Faculty: Most faculty members are guest faculty. The teaching quality is very poor. Very few internal marks are given by teachers. There are no external activities and no proper placement support. The teaching quality is poor, and there are no classes and labs on time. No one seems to care about the students in this college.

Faculty: Teachers are qualified, helpful, and knowledgeable. Every teacher is knowledgeable. The teaching qualities are good. The semester exams are difficult because they are conducted by RTU, Kotak, and they make the exam paper tough, so we can say it is a little bit tough.

Faculty: Teachers were really qualified and knowledgeable. I would say the course was a little outdated, but it was good. Students had to put in extra effort and learn skills to succeed, which was necessary anywhere. After all, students became ready for the industry. They took us on frequent industry visits. The ICI student chapter was a club that really helped students grow. The semester exams were not that tough. If students studied the syllabus completely, they could score amazing marks.

Faculty: Faculty members and student handling in this institute are good and are highly skilled. Faculty provide students a better future to secure their future while preparing them for various types of courses and curriculum. A wide range of courses like B.A., B.Sc., B.Tech, and Master's professional courses are provided. Courses are in a very wide range, and it provides different streams of courses.

Faculty: Teachers and faculty are good. Not all, but they are nice and humble, except for 2–3. I must say that with this amount of money and the quality of faculty, it is good because they are helpful. They guide you and stick with you whenever you need them.

Faculty: Most of the faculty in this college is pretty decent and frank with students. Some teachers are not good they are qualified yet they are unable to teach them. The curriculum is also good it makes you industry-ready. After studying an undergraduate course for four years, the examination level is somewhere between moderate and hard.

Faculty: Teachers are good enough. They are hardworking, and I think this is the only positive thing about MITRC. If you have concentration and focus while studying, you understand the topics. The curriculum is average. It is according to BTU. As we know, today's world is very advanced in everything, but still, not enough practical curriculum is applied. They teach us the BTU-related syllabus. The good thing is that they arrange external training or something similar every year. The semester exams are no...

Faculty: Faculty members are helpful, qualified, and explain the concepts clearly. Most teachers are supportive and encourage students to ask questions. The teaching quality is good. This course gives a strong foundation for higher studies and future career opportunities. The BCA curriculum covers important subjects like programming, DBMS, Operating Systems, and Computer Organisation, but students should also learn additional skills on their own to become industry-ready. The semester exams are of moderat...

Faculty: Teachers were average, and I would not say they were very helpful. The curriculum was outdated. They encouraged students to take internships to become job-ready, but overall, the curriculum was not very good. However, things had started changing, and SKIT was preparing its own curriculum. So I could not say what the situation would be in the future.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful, knowledgeable, and supportive. They encourage students to participate in various activities. It makes the classes innovative and creative. The course curriculum is relevant and helps make students industry-ready. The semester exams are really easy if we study well.

Faculty: Most faculty members are supportive, experienced, and explain concepts clearly. Some teachers are very helpful. The overall percentage is good, and internal assessment also helps in improving final results. Semester exams are moderately difficult, and students who attend classes regularly and study before the exam can easily pass.

Faculty: Some teachers are helpful, while some teachers are very rude. The teaching quality is average. The course is relevant because some changes are made compared to other colleges. The exams are of average difficulty. They are neither very difficult nor very easy.

Faculty: The course is not very difficult. The papers are not checked very strictly. Even during exam times, the crowd is too much without proper management. Some teachers are very rude.

Faculty: Teachers are knowledgeable. But they are not helpful. They just come and complete their Attendance and teach us with low energy. Many classes are not held properly. The syllabus is still in the backlog. Physics faculty GP Joshi yake bribed students with Rs. 5000 for clearing back, and he gave students back even after scoring to earn money.

Faculty: Most teachers are helpful and explain topics properly if you attend classes regularly. Some faculty members are really supportive, while a few depend more on presentations. The syllabus covers the basics, but students should also learn extra skills like coding and projects on their own. Semester exams are not very difficult if you study regularly. Internal marks also help, so the overall pass percentage is quite good.