AKGEC Ghaziabad Faculty Details & Reviews ,Ghaziabad

Faculty: Some teachers are helpful, and some are so rude. All faculty members are knowledgeable. Their teaching quality is good. Semester exam depends on the university, and they are moderate. The university of this college is unpredictable, and they did not follow the schedule.

Faculty: Teachers were very helpful, knowledgeable, and qualified. Teaching quality was also very good. There was a moderate level of difficulty in semester exams in college. The pass percentage for students was generally high placement rates ranging from 50% to 90%.

Faculty: Faculty members were qualified but lacked experience. Their teaching quality was bad. They did not know what they had to teach. The lab assistant also became a teacher. Our course curriculum was not relevant, and that did not made students industry-ready. Semester exam was easy, and 70% was the pass percentage.

Faculty: Teachers of first year are quite average, but teachers of second year are very poor. There was a teacher named XXXX, who never taught COA in her life, suddenly came from RKGIT Kanpur to AKGEC to teach second year. She totally screwed me in COA. She doesn't teach anything. Python teacher was a lab assistant earlier and suddenly became a professor due to a shortage of teachers. Only two classes of Python in a week, and even in that, he took leave many times. Only scrolls PPTs, doesn't teach anythi...

Faculty: The teachers are also disciplined because they are regular in lectures and always teach with sincerity. The teaching quality is excellent. The curriculum is relevant and makes the students ready for industrial work. The semester exams are average, and the passing criteria are to score 40% marks in each subject.

Faculty: Teachers are good, helpful, but some are not. Semester exams are of a moderate level. Teachers conduct good internals. They use good techniques to teach on smart boards and have a clear voice mic system. It should increase productivity by giving extra assignments.

Faculty: Teachers are good, but the management is not. Teachers are helpful and provide notes and PPTs for exams, and they try to provide quality education. However, the education system in our college is not very good.

Faculty: Faculty members are really helpful and supportive. The curriculum is old school. In first year, we got exposure to all the fields. There are 3 exams before the university exam. Sessional test 1 is 25 marks, sessional test 2 is 50 marks, and pre-university test is 70 marks. The level of exams is moderate, they are mostly PYQ based. We learn only one coding subject in the first year. The university is very bad, with no proper response and checking.

Faculty: All teachers are experienced and their manners are good. All faculty teaching manners are very good. 95% of students pass each semester. Nothing is difficult in this college because all the faculty members teach their own subjects easily. They all have experience in their subject.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful. The exam difficulty level is hard but teachers may help the weak student a lot. If we are from the bottom in the result, then we may meet the dean in 1st year, and he may call our parents to tell them about our future achievements in studies. It is accredited A+ by NAAC.

Faculty: We will hardly find any supportive faculty members like 1 or 2 and most of them are just there to read slides in front of students. Exams are easy because the same questions are being asked that came in previous years and don't benefit if we are looking for growth.

Faculty: ach month, you have to participate in a sessional test and sometimes STT. The course curriculum is entirely based on AKTU, which is poorly designed, so that CSE students and those in CSE AIML or CSE-other streams must study the same syllabus for two years. Only 1-3 subjects are electives for specific branches in their pre-final and final years. I am a sophomore in the CSE-other branch, but I haven't encountered any specific curriculum regarding this. No statistics, no R, no Trust, no RAG, just C...

Faculty: The teacher are well-qualified and have industry-level knowledge. College has highly equipped and advanced labs. There is robotics in the college too, but the college majorly focuses on academics. There are also technical research centers in the college where student can practice by their own.

Faculty: Teachers are good. Many teachers are doctorates in their subjects. First-year, faculty members are the best, and after that, faculty quality is degraded. There are a lot of exams called St's and PUT, which are organised by the college to disturb students' extra skills activities. The internal exam standard is good enough.

Faculty: It is affiliated with AKTU. There are a lot of delays in exams and their results. Also, there are many irregularities in exams since it is a university. Faculty are well-educated and knowledgeable. Some are very helpful, and some think they are your master of life.