St. John College of Engineering & Management Faculty Details & Reviews ,Maharashtra - Other

Faculty: Faculty members of the college differ from department to department like faculty of AIML is a real hill so four stars are just to them. They are cooperative and supportive, especially the head of the department. I have heard about the strictness of HOD from the IT and CE departments.

Faculty: The faculty is very friendly they will help you with your personal life as well as your career, Exam are pretty tough but you can pass easily but hard to score the high percentile, there are few curriculum help the students to understand what they need in industry .

Faculty: Faculty members are generally helpful and possess good knowledge of their subjects. They are supportive and try to make concepts easier to understand. The teaching style can be more interactive at times. The course curriculum is mostly relevant and covers the fundamental concepts, but it could be improved to be more in line with current industry trends and technologies. Faculty members are friendly and help us to manage our world. Various workshops are conducted to improve our skills.

Faculty: Faculty members try their best. The course curriculum is relevant. Semester exams are a bit difficult but not to worry because it is autonomous so the papers are made inside the college only. We should score more than 5 points and if we score more than 7 points, then it is good.

Faculty: Teachers are highly qualified. The best in my preference are Reshma Chavan and Parul Jha ma'am. Since the college is autonomous, there are benefits as well. The syllabus is small and divided into two terms, so this burden is less and you can focus on more other things. Most people in college use this for coding and other activities.

Faculty: Not good enough need more good faculty members. They are local. There is no proper understanding and learning skills. The course curriculum can make students ready for the placements but not for high-end packages. It provides average packages. Exams are above average hard. Strict question banks are provided and papers are taken frequently.

Faculty: SJCEM has qualified faculty, a university-approved curriculum, and structured exams. Teaching uses modern methods, with mentorship for students. The curriculum includes theory, practical, and industry exposure. Exams follow internal and university assessments.

Faculty: St. John College of Engineering and Management offers a robust educational framework for its engineering program, focusing on a quality factor and, relevant curriculum. It has a structured examination system. The passing percentage is around 40%.

Faculty: Exams are decent, but again, they are not of the level ready for industry. The passing percentage is 40%. The college curriculum is more focused on assignments and other things that are not very practical and do not support for development of a student. The teachers are not knowledgeable, and they do not support them.

Faculty: The teaching staff is good, and all teachers are well-qualified with their respective department degrees. Some teachers also hold Ph.D. degrees, so teaching quality is good. They help students to get ready to work in real-time work with the company, not only theory knowledge. 45% is the passing criteria for the end-semester examination.

Faculty: Many faculty members lack teaching skills and seem interested in helping students. Course curriculum is outdated and not aligned with the industry standards making it difficult for students to gain relevant skills students have to rely on online platforms to study.

Faculty: Teachers are knowledgeable but only some are helpful for students. Semester exams are average if you study you will pass, otherwise may not pass. Courses are good. Faculty members are good, some are rude some are strict, which is expected. Exams are taken very strict.

Faculty: Some teachers have only graduated and don't meet the quality of teaching in the real-life world. Teachers should focus on students' skills not on their basis of attendance where students are been judged by faculty based on attendance. If any students have less attendance they are considered idiots who have no skills.

Faculty: Faculty members are hardworking and teaching is good. Faculty members with good subject knowledge and are skilled in their specific faculty members takes under consideration the problems and issues faced by the students and helps in problem solving. They always try to help students in understanding the concept.

Faculty: Only some teachers are helpful many do not have good faculty to teach updated versions of computer engineering, they do not behave well during class and do not speak in English no doubt clear session. Students are not ready for industries only in February students are industry-ready by own by talent and hard work. Semester exams are very difficult and difficult to get passing marks, the passing percentage is 40%.