Chandigarh University (CU) Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: Talking about the faculty, some of them are very helpful, but no matter what, there is biasness with students, which should not be there. The course includes informative subjects that enhance our knowledge, but some subjects feel like a waste of time and there is no need to study that.

Faculty: Faculty members are brilliant and are experts in their field. They make it easy to understand concepts. They are always there to help students in any possible way. In each semester, for theory subjects, there are 60 marks external (end-semester exams) and 40 marks internals. Internals consist of mid-semester tests (held twice every semester), assignments/term papers, presentations, surprise tests, quizzes, and 2 marks for attendance above 90%. For practicals, there are 60 marks of internals, whi...

Faculty: Some teachers are very useful, but many teachers are so egoistic. It is easy to clear the semester exams because papers are easy. Many teachers help us like our parents. They are very supportive. Teachers over here have good knowledge of their subjects.

Faculty: The teachers are well qualified and have all the knowledge required to teach and make us learn, and the quality of teaching is actually average. The course curriculum is relevant. They make us learn the latest courses on a good platform, which makes us industry-ready. The difficulty level of semester exams is mid, and the pass percentage is 90 percent.

Faculty: The teaching quality is nice, and their notes are uploaded online, so they are very good. It makes the students industry-ready. The mid-semester exams are quite easy, but the end-semester exams are a bit harder. The end-semester exams test your understanding of the subject, but the mid-semester can be done easily.

Faculty: The teachers here are mixed, some have good knowledge while some may focus only on the theory part, which is not good. The exams are held thrice: two mid-semester and end-semester. The marks distribution is 70 internal, 30 external. The exams are of moderate level.

Faculty: Teachers at CU are very helpful, qualified, well-educated, and full of knowledge. Teaching quality is good, but there is not sufficient time for the semester syllabus. The course curriculum is mostly relevant. Semester exams are not very difficult, but it depends on how you prepare.

Faculty: Teachers are very supportive in the first year when you need them the most. Then you figure it out on your own. Teachers are there to guide and mentor. They focus more on practical knowledge than theory. Exams are not that hard, and the syllabus is covered before exams.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful and friendly, not just in class but also after their class times. They have good knowledge about their subject and teach very well, except for some. The course curriculum is so well designed according to future industry needs and is easy to understand for every student. Semester exams are neither very easy nor very difficult. They are well designed according to students' understanding ability.

Faculty: Talking about teachers, they are very helpful with professional development and personal issues. The course curriculum is also relevant, as we learn many technologies every semester. The bad thing is that the exams don't have any pattern. They give very random questions, which are just set by the computer.

Faculty: This is the part which I don't like. Just think, you are studying CSE and you have subjects like Biology, which are mandatory but not grade courses. We already have many deadlines to deal with, and they are adding more and more, which are not even matching the skills we should have. Teachers are good and helpful, but only if you are also a bit cooperative. Semester exams are not that difficult to pass.

Faculty: Faculty in the CSE department is not good. Many teachers are unable to explain topics clearly. They just read from the PPT. The curriculum is okay but not very good, as most of the real learning still depends on self-study. Overall, the academics are manageable, but the quality of teaching definitely needs improvement.

Faculty: Teachers are generally well qualified. Many holding doctorate degrees and industry experience. They are approachable, helpful, and supportive, and emphasize practical learning alongside theory. The curriculum is designed to be industry-oriented. It includes emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning. Semester exams in Chandigarh University are moderately challenging.

Faculty: Most teachers in my course are experienced and explain topics well with practical examples. They are approachable and helpful if you ask doubts after class. The curriculum is relevant because Mechatronics involves coding, electronics, mechanical concepts, and robotics, and the subjects reflect that mix quite well. Exams are held on time and are moderate in difficulty if you follow classes. Internal marks, lab work, and assignments also contribute, so the pass percentage is high for students who ...

Faculty: The faculty is helpful qualified and knowledgeable and the teaching quality is clear and practical. The curriculum is relevant and aligned with industry needs offering good hands on learning. Semester exams are moderate difficult but fair and most students passed with ease with an overall pass percentage of 85 to 90 percent.