KR Mangalam University Faculty Details & Reviews ,Gurgaon

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. There are also Ph.D.-qualified teachers. Teachers are very good, and their teaching quality is very good. The course curriculum is relevant. It makes students industry-ready. Semester exams are 70% difficult.

Faculty: Some teachers are excellent, whereas some are qualified but are not that good in their domains. Although teachers are supportive and helpful, students' demands are also taken care of. The dean of every school (e.g., SOET) is accountable. Faculty members provide well organised study materials, notes, important topics, & relevant resources.

Faculty: The teaching quality is great. Teachers are helpful with doubts. However, there's no such difference between B.Tech (CSE (AI and ML) and B.Tech (CSE) until the third year. Semester exams are moderate to hard. The pass percentage is above 70 percent. The course curriculum is relevant. However, more industry-ready matters need to be taught to students from basics all the way up to advanced.

Faculty: Faculty is very good. All our teachers are highly qualified and knowledgeable. They prepare us for placements from the beginning. The course curriculum has been relevant since the first semester. The college also takes us on industrial trips. The semester exams range from moderate to difficult, depending on how regularly we attend classes and how much we study.

Faculty: Faculty members are very good. Exams are conducted very strictly, and the question papers are very professional. One thing I would say about the faculty is that they are very attentive towards students and genuinely want us to grow.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful. Since I got here at the university, I encountered many problems, but there was always my mentor available for us. All of them are qualified to Ph.D. levels, and every teacher is good with their specific course. The quality of teaching is also good. The course curriculum is relevant, but it is now a little outdated, far behind compared to others. All courses got upgraded, and teachers were also recruited for it. It helps us.

Faculty: Teachers were quite helpful and supportive. They were available to answer queries whenever we needed. The overall quality of teaching was pretty good. About the relevance of the course, it's pretty important, both in society and in an ethical sense. The medical industry is currently in need of students with EMT. The difficulty level of exams was moderate to high. The passing percentage was 40 percent.

Faculty: The faculty is well qualified, knowledgeable, and supportive. The teaching is a good mix of theory and practical advice and it helps with career advice. Semester exams are moderate to difficult and regular preparation and attendance are generally enough to pass.

Faculty: Teachers are knowledgeable, supportive, and dedicated to students' academic and overall development. Faculty members are experienced and approachable. A student-centric approach is used by faculty members. Exams are up to the mark according to the NEP curriculum. The marking is very fair.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful and have good knowledge of their subjects. The quality of teaching is excellent. They are very understanding of students' problems. The semester exams are not very difficult. The pass percentage for exams is a minimum of 50%. If students study well, they do not fail.

Faculty: Some teachers are helpful, and a few teachers are qualified but not that excellent in their domain. There are fines to pay if you do not wear an ID Card. The curriculum is okay for the foundation of basic building, but if you want to do competitive and advanced learning, then you have to do it yourself.

Faculty: The faculty is well qualified and knowledgeable. The teaching quality is good. Teachers are conducting mentor-mentee sessions, which are very beneficial for students. They can discuss their doubts and problems with teachers individually. The pass percentage is 100 percent. Teachers provide adequate study material.

Faculty: The faculty members are well qualified and knowledgeable. The quality of teaching is very good. They use various teaching methods, such as case discussion, flip classroom, case-based discussion, and chalk and talk. The curriculum is well aligned with the course. It makes students future-ready.

Faculty: Faculty is knowledgeable and very cooperative. Faculty teach us in a very good way. They make us understand the level of each student, then use various teaching methods such as case discussion, group discussion, and many more. There are also mentor-mentee sessions.

Faculty: Faculty members are well qualified and knowledgeable. Teaching quality is good. They use various teaching methods such as chalk and talk, group discussions, and case-based discussions. The course curriculum is relevant and makes students industry-ready. The exams are not very difficult.