IIIT Nagpur Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: The faculty is good, no doubt. The study is also awesome. They are very helpful in teaching. Semester exams are not that difficult, if you are studying 1 week before the exams, you can easily score 7-8 points.

Faculty: Faculty are quite good. For the courses that you require mostly like DSA and web development are quite good but when it comes to the remaining subjects they are also good but a few aren't but we can get through it. While exams are pretty tough, they should be tough.

Faculty: The lectures are good and have a surplus of knowledge. However, it is not always the case that one who knows can also teach. Some of the teachers put their heart into teaching, while others just come for formality, tiring the students and themselves. I would say the courses are relevant and help to build the knowledge and basics required in the industry.

Faculty: The curriculum is somewhat new in our course as IoT is a new field, also teachers are good. All the faculty members are Ph.D. Most of them are helpful and friendly. The difficulty of exam is really low. The passing rate is at forty percent of the toppers. In lab subject, everyone gets pass.

Faculty: The college faculty comes from higher professional colleges like IIITN, IIT, and NIT. They did their Ph.D. at those professional colleges and have around 3 to 4 years of research experience. They are experienced and friendly with our college students.

Faculty: Teachers are good and helpful. The courses are the latest. Exams are easy, but the CGPA criteria are bad. The college location is a downside, and the gender ratio is bad. It is around 20:1 or even 30:1, which is a significant issue, especially since the college doesn’t follow the 33% women’s reservation criteria.

Faculty: Faculty in our college is very good. They are highly professional and many have completed their Ph.D. from NIT, IIIT, and other reputed institutions. They also have significant certificates from research centers and are very experienced. The examination pattern includes midterm examinations and a semester exam, and our faculty corrects those papers.

Faculty: Some faculty members are okay, but some lack the lustre, while others show actual dedication to their course. As far as the curriculum is concerned, it is very damn heavy and requires determination, not just attending lectures. Self-study is surely required, as the semester exams are difficult for all.

Faculty: Overall, the faculty members are good, but they are of every type, some are good, some are bad, and some are average. Many have good knowledge in their fields. The curriculum is designed for the needs of the present times, but some subjects don't have good enough teachers to teach them, so it becomes irrelevant in the HCI course. Semesters are fairly tough, and you can't pass without studying. The passing percentage is 80%.

Faculty: Some faculty members are okay, but some lack the lustre, while others show actual dedication to their course. As far as the curriculum is concerned, it is very heavy and requires determination, not just attending lectures. Self-study is surely required as the semester exams are difficult for all.

Faculty: Some faculty members are okay, but some lack the lustre, while others show actual dedication to their course. As far as the curriculum is concerned, it is very heavy and requires determination, not just attending lectures. Self-study is surely required, as the semester exams are difficult for all.

Faculty: For the first year, few teachers are adjunct professors who are actually doing their PhDs from the institute, then next year onwards. Students get Ph.D. holders as teachers. The curriculum is fair enough which is not very difficult. The exam from this year is normal mid-semester and end-semester format.

Faculty: Qualified teachers, and the college is student-friendly, prioritizes students' opinions, and a pretty good curriculum and helpful staff make students industry-relevant. Semester exams are a bit tough, 7 is a better score. Pass percentage is 40% for non-core subjects and 35% for core.

Faculty: Good faculty members and teaching were also good. All lecturers were more educated. Marking system was also good and syllabus was not too high. Semester exams were going very strictly, and sports and yoga were also there. The exam paper was tough enough. Teaching was better but self study was needed for students.

Faculty: Faculties are okay, but some lack the luster. However, some show actual dedication to their course. As far as the curriculum is concerned, it is very heavy and requires determination, not just attending lectures. Self-study is surely required as the semester exams are difficult for all.