MIT School of Computing Faculty Details & Reviews ,Loni Kalbhor, Pune

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. The teaching quality is good, and they help us solve problems. They help us in anything they can. We can't judge the exam the less you study, the more difficult the exam is, and the more you study, the easier the exam gets. The pass percentage in my college is around 40 percent. If the exam is 50, then you have to get 20 marks to pass. Faculty members are good. They help us with study and problem-solving.

Faculty: All faculty members are approachable, well-qualified, and trained. The course curriculum is very relevant and makes students industry-ready. You need at least 4.5 plus CGPA to get promoted to the next class and not more than 4 back. Papers are not too hard it's easy to crack the exams.

Faculty: At MIT ADTU, teachers are generally helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. The teaching quality is good. The curriculum is mostly relevant and industry-oriented. Semester exams are moderate in difficulty. Pass percentage varies by course.

Faculty: Faculty members are so good and qualified. They keep an eye on every student, there are doubt sessions and also there are frequent tests for each subject. The toughness of our exams is moderate and the passing percentage is 60 percent. The level of end semester exam is tough.

Faculty: Faculty members are so good and qualified. They keep an eye on every student. There are doubt sessions, and also there are frequent tests for each subject. The toughness of our exams is moderate, and the passing percentage is 60%. The level of end-semester exam is moderate.

Faculty: Exams are too strict, and the course isn't always finished. Some teachers take classes on Saturdays or overtime if they fail. They act as if it is our fault that they were unable to complete the syllabus on time. When the exams are tough, they blame it on us for not studying.

Faculty: Faculty members are so good and qualified. They keep an eye on every student, there are doubt sessions, and there are frequent tests for each subject. The toughness of our exams is moderate, and the passing percentage is 70%. The level of the end-of-semester exam is tough.

Faculty: Faculty members are so good and qualified. They keep an eye on every student, there are doubt sessions, and there are frequent tests for each subject. The toughness of our exams is moderate, and the passing percentage is 70%. The level of the end-of-semester exam is tough.

Faculty: Faculty members are so good and qualified. They keep an eye on every student, there are doubt sessions, and there are frequent tests for each subject. The toughness of our exams is moderate, and the passing percentage is 60%. The level of the end-of-semester exam is tough.

Faculty: The faculty is a mix of experienced professors and young PhDs, generally supportive and knowledgeable. Some go out of their way to help students with their projects. Teaching quality depends on the subject, but overall, it is decent. The curriculum is quiet.

Faculty: The teachers are not at all good, as they take students for time pass. I don't know, something is wrong with the faculty. Teaching quality is decent, and sometimes even the teachers can't answer some questions. There is a lack of planning for the course, it is not relevant. Exams are very easy, they want each student to pass. They do not make students industry-ready at all. Also, the teaching faculty has been changing quite fast. This has an adverse effect on students.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and come from well-educated backgrounds. Most of the teachers are supportive and help you to balance both academic and non-academic fields. Teachers teach both theory and practical skills to the students which makes the students industry-ready. Semester exams are pretty easy if you study even 3 days ago you are going to top the exam with flying marks. But need to give your 100% to it within the given time limit. 40% is the passing criteria for the semester exams.

Faculty: Faculty members are seen as mentors who guide students in their academic and career paths. The faculty are experts and can effectively impart knowledge. The university's emphasis on practical applications and hands-on learning experiences is very well appreciated by our batch. MIT ADT is known for its emphasis on practical learning and hands on experience. The university offers a wide range of programs catering to diverse interests and career paths. Marks for each main subject are given out of 1...

Faculty: Teaching quality varies, with programming faculty often falling short, necessitating significant self-study for students. The curriculum industry relevance and job readiness are unclear. While semester exams are moderately difficult with a high pass rate (90%-95%), some subjects have outdated content. For CSE first-year students, the mechanical workshop subject is particularly irrelevant and poorly taught.

Faculty: Teachers at MIT ADT University are helpful well qualified and knowledgeable in their subjects. Most of them are approachable and support students in projects and research. The teaching quality is good combining theory with practical learning. The course curriculum is updated regularly and is quite relevant to industry needs especially in fields like engineering design and management. Semester exams are moderately difficult but manageable with regular study. The pass percentage is generally high ...