MIT School of Food Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Loni Kalbhor, Pune

Faculty: Nearly all teachers all Ph.D. qualified. They are open to solve questions of the students. They are helpful and knowledgeable. All staff members are motivating to students. Curriculum is relevant and makes students industry ready. Pass percentage is above 90%.

Faculty: Most of the teachers are Ph.D. holders. They deliver the concepts well. Projector screens and PPTs are used for the lectures. The syllabus is structured. Right from Chemistry to Microbiology, everything is covered. As you approach the next semester, the project topics are discussed.

Faculty: The semester exams are hard. The curriculum activity of the college is good. The teaching faculty members are good. The exam schedule is good. Teachers are very helpful in giving mentorship. Teaching skills of teachers are excellent for the different activities that are arranged in class. The syllabus is good. The teaching faculty members are good.

Faculty: The teachers were highly qualified, supportive, and possessed strong subject knowledge. The teaching quality is interactive, research-driven, and aligned with industry needs. The course curriculum is highly relevant and regularly updated to meet industry standards. It equips students with practical skills, regulatory knowledge, and technical expertise for industry readiness. Semester exams are moderately challenging, focusing on conceptual understanding and practical application. The pass percen...

Faculty: Teachers are excellent and help us understand the syllabus. They solve doubts and provide knowledge that is important for personality development and motivates us. Many teachers are PhD holders and have strong academic as well as industry backgrounds. They are supportive and guiding students in research.

Faculty: Teachers are qualified and knowledgeable about each topic. The course curriculum is very helpful for students and prepares them for the industry. Semester exams are critical and require extensive technical knowledge.

Faculty: The teachers are qualified and knowledgeable about each topic. The course curriculum is very helpful for students and prepares them for the industry. Semester exams are critical and require extensive technical knowledge.

Faculty: The teachers are very kind and helpful, always motivating the students and never making them feel disappointed. They come up with fun activities and teaching methods that are very effective. The curriculum is significantly better in terms of teaching every semester’s subjects.

Faculty: Teachers are highly qualified, supportive, and possess strong subject knowledge. The teaching quality was excellent, with a focus on practical understanding and industry-oriented learning. The course makes students ready for industry, but industries are not coming to the college.

Faculty: Teachers are qualified and knowledgeable, and know how to convey subjects. The courses are relevant. You get to choose what you want to learn is a good thing. Industrial visits also make students learn more. Overall, the college is good for food technology.

Faculty: Faculty members at MIT SoFT are very helpful, knowledgeable, and well-qualified. The curriculum is industry-relevant, covering food sector skills. Semester exams are moderately difficult, with a high pass percentage. If the lectures are attended regularly and studied properly, the course is manageable.

Faculty: Overall, teachers are good. They teach the lessons. The course is not research-intensive, good for those who want to go into business. The exams are moderately difficult. The grading is tough. Attendance 75% is compulsory. There are no scholarships.

Faculty: There are a few teachers who have a genuine interest in imparting knowledge to students. They usually go the extra mile to help students in every way they can. Meanwhile, most teachers are only concerned with completing the syllabus. The syllabus is up to date in most areas.

Faculty: Core courses and open elective courses, industry visits, laboratory work, manual completion, internships, major and minor projects, internal assessments, end-semester exams, and continuous evaluation through skill tests, case studies, group discussions, PowerPoint presentations, and quizzes.

Faculty: Semester exams are average. It is not very difficult. It is easy to pass and score. Though this makes no sense because there's no placement, and the best student walked out of the interview. The department does not focus on interpersonal skills at all. There is no proper career guidance.