CUSAT Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: There are fewer responsible teachers, and the management system is not very good. The curriculum is good. If the students put in some effort beyond the syllabus, it will be a huge benefit to stand out and make them industry-ready. The semester exams are moderate, and if students are willing to put in effort for the exams, they will surely pass.

Faculty: Faculty members are really strict, especially for the Computer Science department. They take a lot of exams compared to other colleges, and the paper evaluation is also strict, but for some branches like IT, Safety, and Fire Engineering, it’s a very high standard.

Faculty: Faculty members are helpful, qualified, and experienced in their subjects. Most teachers are supportive and clear doubts whenever needed. Teaching quality is good, and classes are conducted regularly. The curriculum is relevant and gives proper knowledge about the course. Exams are moderate level, and students who attend classes and study regularly can pass easily. Internal exams, assignments, and practicals help students prepare well for semester exams. Overall, academics are satisfactory.

Faculty: Faculty is mostly good. Exams are postponed if there is any issue, and student groups are strong in influencing decisions. They do not force students to attend classes. It is optional, so students need to have proper self-discipline.

Faculty: Teachers are qualified, helpful, and knowledgeable. Teaching quality is generally good. The course curriculum is relevant. It makes students industry-ready, as we have internships and projects in each semester. Semester exams are not very difficult. They are easy if we study regularly.

Faculty: There is a shortage of permanent faculty members currently. The available faculty members are well qualified and helpful. The course curriculum is mostly relevant, but I heard from my seniors, it does not fully make students industry-ready. Semester exams are moderate with a good pass percentage.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful. The syllabus is tougher than the Kerala Technological University syllabus. Here, students are more focused on research and projects than exam marks. In the end-semester exam, students must score 40% in the end-semester exam and 40% overall (internal + external) to pass.

Faculty: Although all teachers are qualified, some of them are not very good at teaching. The teaching quality can be termed as average. CUSAT’s syllabus is always up to date and is relevant, focusing on industry readiness when compared to the KTU syllabus. Semester exams are usually average. The question papers are prepared by the teachers of CUSAT and CUCEK themselves. The pass percentage for the IT branch last year was 78%.

Faculty: The course curriculum is very good. Faculty members are the best for IT. Apart from the 1st semester, where it's common for all those faculty, some are horrible. After the first year, it's very good. Exams are comparatively difficult compared to KTU, but the syllabus is more relevant.

Faculty: The faculty members in my college are well-qualified, experienced, and supportive. Teachers explain concepts clearly and are approachable for doubt clearing. They guide us in academics, projects, and exam preparation. Internal exams and lab internals are conducted accurately, which students find university exams easier.

Faculty: The department benefits from experienced faculty members whose advice helps bridge the gap between theory and practice. While the schedule can get busy, focusing on labs and solving previous year papers makes the exams quite manageable.

Faculty: We have well-structured placement training since the 1st semester, which helps us develop our skills and gain confidence so that we are able to perform our best during placements. The faculty of the CS department are highly qualified and skilled. Our department has an overall pass percentage of 83.81 percent (2024–2028 batch).

Faculty: Teachers are generally qualified and knowledgeable. Most of them are helpful when approached. Teaching quality varied among faculty but was overall satisfactory. The course curriculum is relevant under KTU, though it is more theory-based and requires additional self-learning to become industry-ready. Semester exams are moderately difficult and need consistent preparation rather than last-minute study. The overall pass percentage is good. Many students pass if they attend classes regularly and pr...

Faculty: The professors are all very helpful, they are all very knowledgeable, and they have a lot of teaching experience. This course is absolutely curriculum-relevant, and it makes the students industry-ready. Since the semester exam is based on practical, it is a little difficult, students have to study hard, otherwise they will not be able to pass. The pass percentage is 40% for each subject.

Faculty: The professors here were very qualified and well-educated. They were all very knowledgeable. Their teaching quality was very good. The faculty members are all very helpful. Here, semester exams were taken every 6 months, which was a bit difficult, and if students don't study well, it's a bit stressful to pass.