RTMNU Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: Faculty members were knowledgeable, but the number of faculty members was very low. Only a limited number of faculty members taught semester after semester. Some faculty members were very old and not very good at teaching the latest programming languages and tools. The course curriculum needed to change because it was not suitable for the latest environment of learning computer science. It was not difficult to pass the semester exams, but students had to focus on understanding the topics and syl...

Faculty: Faculty members are educated and well-qualified, but some are not good at teaching. They do not understand the latest technologies and programming IDEs, so it is difficult to learn. The course curriculum is very lengthy. Semester exams are conducted frequently, but our batch is non-autonomous, so it is quite hard to score.

Faculty: Teachers are well-qualified and knowledgeable. The main faculty members are alumni of this college, and others join after taking the UPSC exam. The teaching quality is also good. This course surely makes students industry-ready, as its curriculum covers all the necessary knowledge. Its implementation is carried out during the Morning Fire Ground Operation held daily, which also helps students become physically fit.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful, well-qualified, and knowledgeable. This course is very important because it helps to rescue living beings' property and many important things. Exams are hard in the semester, it is difficult because you have to manage studying with training for the fire service.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful and knowledgeable, and overall, teaching is excellent. Through the internship programme and curricular activities, students are industry-ready. The semester exams ensure that students will be industry-ready with practical and written exams.

Faculty: All faculty members are helpful and qualified. The course curriculum is well designed and is capable of making students industry-ready, as most of the PSUs recruit directly from college without any entrance exam. Semester exams are not that difficult if you study, you can score well.

Faculty: The college has good faculty with high knowledge. Some are from top institutions like IIT and NIT, and some are foreign-returned. Some faculty are unable to express or explain, but have great subject knowledge. As always, the curriculum is so old, but the students are industry-ready with skills.

Faculty: The faculty members are experienced officers from the fire and safety domain. They teach using real-life examples and practical demonstrations. Their guidance is very helpful for students who want to build a career in fire engineering. Campus life is disciplined because the course includes physical training, drills and routine schedules. However, students enjoy good bonding, extracurricular activities and cultural events. It's not like a typical engineering college, but it has a strong learning ...

Faculty: Some good faculty members, some are average, but they are well qualified from good colleges like VNIT, IITs, and have great knowledge about the subject. The curriculum is very relevant compared to other colleges, and the college believes in practical knowledge; it is industry-ready.

Faculty: Our college teachers were well qualified. Most of our faculty members were Ph.D. degree holders. But their teaching qualities were very old and followed a classic style. Some faculty members were not able to teach on smart boards. Our branch curriculum was very vast, and passing semester exams was tough.

Faculty: Teachers are highly qualified and knowledgeable. The course is too relevant to the requirements of the industry. Sem exams are not too difficult, and they can be easily qualified with one to 2 hrs of daily study. Almost every student passed. Teaching quality is good with many professors teaching different fire subjects as well as guest faculty.

Faculty: Faculty members are qualified most faculty members hold a Ph.D. degree and some are trainees who come after qualifying in GATE examination. The difficulty of passing exam is moderate. The passing percentage is only 45 percent consists of theory and practical. Teaching quality is not good.

Faculty: The facilities are well qualified. Their teaching quality is not good some teaching staff are very good at their teaching but not everyone. Course curriculum is most tied to previous questions and books such as VBD publications. Mostly students prepared follow the pyq. The practical education is very low only theoretical knowledge is provided. The difficulty of passing exams is moderate.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. They help in solving problems easily and assist us in dealing with any issues. The semester exams in the college are not too difficult but moderate. Anyone who is familiar with the course will find them easy. There are even and odd semester patterns, which I think make the students industry-ready.

Faculty: Faculty is dependent on the department some departments have good faculty but some do not. Curriculum and exam pattern are I think above average. Teachers are not aware of latest trends in technology and today needs. The syllabus is not up to date so you have to do extra work for your growth and for placement purposes.