The NCERT textbook (Class 11, Physics, Chapter 2) provides clear rules for determining significant figures:
1. Every nonzero digit counts
Why it’s true: If a digit isn’t zero, it came directly from your measuring device (say, a ruler or a stopwatch). There’s no doubt it’s “real” data.
Example: “123.4”
Here, 1, 2, 3, and 4 each represent something your instrument measured directly. So you have 4 significant figures.
Tip: Whenever you see a digit from 1 to 9, just count it—no questions asked.
2. Zeros between nonzero digits count
Why it’s true: A zero that sits between two nonzero digits wasn’t just a placeholder—it’s part of the actual value.
Example: “5003”
The two middle zeros tell you that the measurement really was “five thousand and three,” not “five thousand.” In other words, your instrument resolved those zeros as real information. So all four digits (5, 0, 0, 3) are significant.
Common mistake: Thinking that “5003” is really just “five” because zeros look empty. In reality, if those zeros weren’t measured, the number would have been written “5×10³” or something similar, not “5003.”
3. Leading zeros (zeros before the first nonzero digit) do not count
Why it’s true: Leading zeros simply place the decimal point—they don’t tell you anything about the precision of your measurement. They’re just placeholders to show “where” the real digits start.
Example: “0.045”
The zeros before the 4 (“0.0”) are not significant. The only digits you’re sure about are 4 and 5, so there are 2 significant figures.
Tip: Anything written purely to “push” the decimal point leftward does not count. You only start counting once you hit a nonzero digit.
4. Zeros at the end of a decimal number always count
Why it’s true: If you write a number like “4.330,” that last zero tells the reader that your instrument can measure to the thousandths place. It’s not just a placeholder—it’s evidence of precision.
Example: “4.330”
All four digits (4, 3, 3, and 0) are significant because the meter (or caliper) showed you that 4.330 was the reading, not simply 4.33 or 4.3. You believed that final zero.
Common pitfall: Dropping the final zero (writing 4.33) might suggest your tool only measured to the hundredths place. But if your device really did measure to the thousandths, you have to show that by keeping the zero.
5. Zeros at the end of a whole number (without a decimal) can be ambiguous
Why it’s tricky: In a number like “5400,” you don’t know if those two zeros were actually read by the instrument, or if they’re just placeholders. Did the scale only measure to the hundreds place (giving 5.4×10³), or did it measure to the tens (5.40×10²), or even to the ones (5.400×10¹)?
Example: “5400”
If someone writes it as 5.40 × 10³, you know for sure it’s three significant figures (5, 4, and 0). If it is written just as “5400,” it might be only two significant figures (“5.4 × 10³”), or it might be four (“5.400 × 10³”), depending on how precise the measuring tool was.
Solution: Whenever possible, switch to scientific notation. That way you explicitly show how many zeros (and decimal places) you trust.