NMIMS Navi Mumbai Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: Professors had significant knowledge about the course, but they were too strict and scared the students with their activities. Professors wont maintain any continuity in taking the topics. Mostly, they are roughly picking some of the topics and delivering them.

Faculty: Professors handle the students so lethargically, and have mid level of experience. Professors report on our performance to the respective parents at the end of every week. Professors randomly suggest students to any events without showing any priority.

Faculty: Faculty is very experienced and well-versed in their field. Along with that, the fees for the course are 2,75,000 rupees per year. Exams are something NMIMS is famous for; the exams are very hard with a 70% failing rate. But the exams are not based on mugging up; rather, they are based on real-life scenarios.

Faculty: Even if the questions are risky or twisted, the teachers taught us the possible ways to answer them in the model examinations themselves. We had undergone repeated practice to face the main examinations without fear. Teachers are proficient in handling practical sessions.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful. They never shy away from solving extra doubts. They are very qualified and knowledgeable. They teach easily. We have semester exams that are moderate in difficulty level, and most of the class passes the exams.

Faculty: We are able to connect with the conceptual learning of teachers, only for the moment of explanations. So it's required to implement some strategies to remember the concept for a long time. Teachers mostly prepare students to pass examinations. Their teaching is based on exam preparation only.

Faculty: Yearly, there would be a little bit of variation in the examination results of the Master of Business Administration department. But most probably the whole results would be above 80%. Teachers actively responded to the students' queries and their concerns. The teaching methods of teachers are understandable but not so interesting.

Faculty: Faculty members have relevant experience, which may be up to 5 years or above. Faculty members usually plan to make the class more useful and sensible to students. It's usually a three-year program that deals with a lot of theoretical sessions with few practicals, and project sessions.

Faculty: Teachers torture us to submit the academic assignments and project report within the offered time, which was so pressurizing, because they schedule the work in shortened time gaps. Teachers made us be punished severely, which was the thing that annoyed them.

Faculty: Teachers are good. The curriculum outlines are great and have a variety of subjects to study from. Updated every year to keep it relevant. Exams are very difficult though and in most semesters at least 10-20% fail and only the retest option is available after that no KT system.

Faculty: In our college, we have highly qualified lecturers and every lecturer holds Ph.D. and PG. The teaching quality is good and they take care of every student. All faculty members are well-dignified. The course curriculum is relevant and it makes students industry-ready. Exams are something that are college is known for. It is more of a school-like system where 2 semesters in the year have 6 subjects 40 marks for the internal tests and 60 marks for the final exams making it 100 and we are given GPA ...

Faculty: Teachers won't have enough knowledge of industrial-based sectors. They simply force us to crack the academic exams which are very important to get a certificate of completion. Teachers could clear doubt based on the basic concepts of the subject taken.

Faculty: With the quality teaching content and amazing technologies. Teachers helped several students clear their degrees with first class, and first class with distinction scores. The management immediately replies to the problems of students, especially for academic growth.

Faculty: We followed a semester system, and the exams were pretty average in difficulty. I mean you could pass by just studying for 3-4 days. Our syllabus was up to date and was really helpful and meaningful. Teachers were very experienced but some of them were rude.

Faculty: Other than the teaching, I would give good ratings to the teachers like assisting with exam preparations, record corrections, and evaluating papers. But their teaching was not so good as I expected. Basically, they cover the syllabus within the time period assigned by the higher authorities so rush fully.