Aristotle's Fallacy: Birth of Classical Physics with Galileo and Newton

Physics Laws of Motion 2025

Syed Aquib Ur Rahman
Updated on Aug 6, 2025 20:46 IST

By Syed Aquib Ur Rahman, Assistant Manager

It’s impossible to get the context of the correct laws of motion by Newton without knowing Aristotle’s Fallacy. It nearly took two millennia to recognise that it’s incorrect to say that motion always needs an external force

This was an empirical observation by Aristotle, a Greek philosopher from ~300 BC, who primarily relied on a logical reasoning framework. Understanding this Aristotelian law of motion and why it is no longer considered accurate provides insight into how science has evolved. It also shows that science needs experimentation to test and verify every observation. 

Artistotle's Fallacy

 

 

Table of content
  • What is Aristotle's Fallacy?
  • Why is Aristotelian Law of Motion a Fallacy?
  • How Galileo and Newton Corrected Aristotle’s Fallacy
  • NCERT Revision Notes for Physics Class 11
  • NCERT Solutions for Physics Class 11
Physics Laws of Motion Logo

What is Aristotle's Fallacy?

Aristotle's Fallacy refers to a mistaken empirical observation from everyday life that an external force is continuously needed to keep an object in motion. If this force stops, the object will come to a stop. Based on this logical reasoning, Aristotle also argued that the natural state of any object is rest. Not motion. 

NCERT explains in the Laws of Motion chapter that the

Aristotelian law of motion may be phrased thus: An external force is required to keep a body in motion.”

It's called Aristotle's Fallacy, as this observation that the object's natural state is rest is the opposite and incorrect to what Newtonian or classical physics proved about the motion of objects.   

Physics Laws of Motion Logo

Why is Aristotelian Law of Motion a Fallacy?

First, if we define the meaning of fallacy, it refers to an incorrect argument. It may seem logical on the surface, but upon closer examination through critical analysis or experimentation, the logic falls apart. 

That’s precisely what happened with the Aristotelian law of motion. 

To repeat, Aristotle assumed that an object requires continuous force to maintain its motion. Otherwise, it stops moving. Because this law was grounded on the fact that the object or body’s natural state was rest

On the surface, this is also true. You can push a box, and the moment you stop moving it, the box remains still. This observation is logical. 

But Aristotle misinterpreted the effect of slowing down as a natural tendency of objects to come to rest.  Before Sir Isaac Newton disproved this, with his First Law of Motion, he mathematically proved that an object in uniform motion will continue moving unless there is an opposing force to stop it, while an object at rest will stay at rest. 

This was, however, Newton's predecessor, Galileo Galilei, who founded the principles of inertia, aka, the Law of Inertia, using experiments on inclined planes. 

The implication of Newtonian physics is twofold. 

  • The motion of an object continues on its own. It doesn’t need a continuous push.
  • If there’s no opposing force like friction or air resistance, the object keeps moving.

In short, Newton proved that the natural state of objects is uniform motion unless interrupted by force. Aristotle understood it the other way around, without accounting for different concepts such as inertia, friction, and force.

This is why we call it Aristotle’s Fallacy.

Physics Laws of Motion Logo

How Galileo and Newton Corrected Aristotle’s Fallacy

Here is a table for reference, you should take note of while answering questions on Aristotle’s Fallacy in your exams. 

Cause of Motion Stopping

Aristotle’s View (Fallacy)

Galileo’s Insight

Newton’s Contribution

Natural State of Objects

Rest is the natural state of every object. They stop moving if not continuously pushed.

Motion is typically an object's natural state if no opposing force exists.

An object will move continuously in a straight line unless an external force acts upon it.

Cause of Motion Stopping

If force is removed, motion stops.

It's friction that causes motion to come to a stop.

The First Law of Motion explains that inertia and net external force are behind the motion of objects.

Understanding of Force

You need a continuous force to keep an object moving.

Only a net force (like friction) can change an object’s motion.

Motion does not always require continuous force. A net external force can cause acceleration or deceleration of an object.

Role of Friction

Friction is not yet accounted for.

Friction is identified as the hidden force that causes motion to stop.

Friction can be quantified, and so can other forces that influence motion through the three laws of motion.

 

Physics Laws of Motion Logo

NCERT Revision Notes for Physics Class 11

Here are some essential notes to revise if you feel you are stuck before your exams. 

Units and Measurements Class 11 Notes Mechanical Properties of Solids Class 11 Notes
Motion in a Straight Line Class 11 Notes Mechanical Properties of Fluids Class 11 Notes
NCERT Class 11 Notes for Motion in a Plane Thermal Properties of Matter Class 11 Notes
Laws of Motion Class 11 Notes Thermodynamics Class 11 Notes
Work, Energy, and Power Class 11 Notes Kinetic Theory of Gas Class 11 Notes
System of Particles and Rotational Motion Class 11 Notes Oscillations Class 11 Notes
Gravitation Class 11 Notes Waves Class 11 Notes

Have a look at these as well. 

NCERT Class 11 Notes for PCM
NCERT Class 11 Physics Notes

 

Physics Laws of Motion Logo

NCERT Solutions for Physics Class 11

Q&A Icon
Commonly asked questions
Q:  

Why did Aristotle's concept of motion seem correct based on everyday experience? 

A: 

Aristotle viewed that a moving body/object would have something external to keep it in motion. Otherwise, that body would stop, as it is the natural state of any object to stay at rest. It was a natural view and a common practical experience for everyone. 

What Aristotle didn't take into consideration was that there are already opposing forces in the natural world, such as friction. A force like friction remains as a net external force in the real world. 

In reality, as we speak, a moving object keeps moving unless something like friction or air slows it down. It's also just like a still object stays still if nothing pushes or pulls it.

Q:  

What was the specific flaw in the Aristotelian law of motion?

A: 

Aristotle's main flaw was that he did not account for forces already present that keep a body at rest or in motion. In classical antiquity physics, during this philosopher's time, invisible and opposing forces, such as friction and air resistance, were not understood. So, it was natural to resort to observation-based answers that would later get disproved by scientists like Galileo and Newton, who introduced rigorous experimentation and mathematical enquiries.

qna

Physics Laws of Motion Exam

Student Forum

chatAnything you would want to ask experts?
Write here...