DTU Faculty Details & Reviews ,Rohini

Faculty: With every course, you generally have a lab in which you have to do some projects too so it's quite interesting and industry-ready. Teachers are good and knowledgeable. Talking about semester exams, you really don't feel when they come and go, except a week prior or if there is a fest or something, then a day before. Overall, exams are difficult and can't be determined as it depends on how well and seriously you prepare.

Faculty: Teachers are very good, the course curriculum is decent but the new passing criterion is the worst for electrical students. Exams are a decent medium level. 35% is the passing criteria. Overall, the electrical branch is good but a little tough. DTU has very good teachers. Labs and lab assistants, but students are very rude.

Faculty: Exams here are just formality; the main weightage is given to your big project of the semester for each of the subjects. That will be considered as the priority for the subject. But with a few exceptions, both the faculty and the curriculum are not that good.

Faculty: Teachers at Delhi Technological University are highly qualified and knowledgeable. They are very helpful. The teaching quality is among the best in the Delhi Technological University. The course curriculum is relevant to daily life and prepares students to join any industry they choose. Although semester exams can be quite tough, students who study for about a month can usually achieve a good CGPA.

Faculty: Teachers are well-qualified, helpful, and very nice. They are always ready to help whenever you have any doubts, and you can clear your queries easily. The curriculum is in a sophisticated manner. If your presence of mind is in class, what the teacher teaches is clear to you, and you listen carefully. Then, semester exams are not too tough.

Faculty: Most instructors are Ph.D. holders, and the teaching mainly focuses on theory, particularly in core branches. The theoretical approach does not adequately prepare students for the industry, necessitating additional learning outside the curriculum. Semester exams tend to be average in difficulty—not too easy, but not overly challenging either. The passing percentage is around 33% to 35%, and the grading system follows a CGPA format.

Faculty: Teachers are good but no one attends lectures so you have to study on your own. You have to study not daily not weekly just one or two weeks before exams. Core subject makes you industry-ready but you have to prepare yourself for teaching. I suggest joining tech society and participating in a hackathon.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, highly qualified, and knowledgeable but their way of teaching is just kind of scrolling PPT in the classroom nothing enthusiastic or interactive but this happens only with few teachers. Curriculum is relevant. Easy to crack exams on the basis of class notes and PYQ prep 33% passing criteria UGC guideline.

Faculty: Teachers are good too. You need to pay attention in class, though, who knows, they might take a hard exam. Some may be okay, but don't make an enemy out of them. Start studying at least a week before. In the first year, they teach everything, with core subjects starting from the second semester.

Faculty: Many teachers are helpful, approachable, and have good qualifications. They are knowledgeable. They are willing to assist students outside of class as well. The course curriculum is fairly relevant and covers the essential subjects needed for industry. Semester exams are moderately difficult. The pass percentage is 35%.

Faculty: Faculty is well-trained – Ph.D. professors qualified in their areas with past experience of almost 8–10+ years. The courses are relevant to real industry needs. Semester exams are moderately hard, but you can pass them easily. Just maintaining CGPA is a task.

Faculty: Teachers are very qualified but not helpful. They do not provide the required knowledge to the students. The curriculum contains very old technologies, and the semester exams are not difficult. The situation is such that teachers do not cover the right portions, and they include different topics in the exams. The checking is not thorough, leading to difficulties for students during exams.

Faculty: Our teachers are very good but do not have good experience. They are trying their best. The curriculum was good when I was studying in college. We have industrial visits once every 6 months. Exams are not difficult to pass. If you want to score, you should study.

Faculty: As I talked before, the faculty members are bad overall as the EE department takes everything too seriously and tasks for everything on time. The curriculum is still chill in a sense as teachers five back sometime. For the exams, the UFM policy is very strict here and back is given if you get caught. The course faculty members are bad. Overall, some teachers are good and supportive but some are so bad to even talk to.

Faculty: The engineering physics faculty at DTU is well-qualified and informed. A few members of the faculty are highly helpful and accessible, particularly for students with research interests. The course structure is theoretically solid and gives a good grounding in physics. Semester exams are surely tough you have to start studying before a couple of weeks. According to new guidelines now you have to score passing marks in theoretical exams, for example in Math mid-sem is out of 25, and end sem out of...