DTU Delhi Faculty Details & Reviews ,Rohini

Faculty: Teachers are mostly qualified and knowledgeable. Their teaching quality varies. Some are very helpful, and others rely more on self-study. The course curriculum covers core CS fundamentals, but students still need extra effort (coding and projects) to be industry-ready. Semester exams are moderate in difficulty. The pass percentage is generally high, with most students clearing exams if they start just before exams.

Faculty: The course is for about 15-20-year-old. It's not very helpful. Most students pass. No changes are made in the curriculum, but according to the new rules. Many students get back because they are not able to pass the exam. The semester exams are not much higher level, they are easy and moderate.

Faculty: Teachers in the 1st year are qualified and knowledgeable, but helpfulness depends on teacher to teacher. Teaching quality is alright. The course curriculum in 1st year is very basic and not really relevant. Semester exams are extremely easy. A good percentage of students pass easily.

Faculty: Overall, it's balanced, the faculty were helpful and managerial. Faculty members were supportive and always ready to help with your doubts and career guidance. The course curriculum was well designed for both practical and theoretical aspects, as well as for placement, how to approach and all.

Faculty: The faculty here is very good, with most of the teachers having high-quality degrees. One of the most famous teachers in our college is HC Verma, sir. If you want to gain good knowledge, they will surely help you in that. They are also pretty cool, but the backlog fees for the exam are 7500, which are very high compared to any other college in India.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful in just providing the syllabus. You have to study by yourself more to score well and maintain a good CGPA. The course is relevant but kind of outdated. It can help students to prepare for industrial readiness. The SE branch's first year is difficult compared to other branches. The course is good.

Faculty: Teaching quality is decent. The course is somewhat relevant, it does make students familiar with the industry. There are many exams for my branch. The pass percentage is about 85%. Some teachers treat their students very well, but some teachers only come for the sake of it and don't teach very much.

Faculty: Some teachers are good, but most of them lack passion for teaching. Although they all are highly qualified. Most of them are PhD holders. Except for some subjects in the first year, the course curriculum is relevant and makes students industry-ready. Semester exams are not exceptionally tough. More than 90 percent of students pass exams easily.

Faculty: The course curriculum is designed such that the student is trained to face the next grade. The Master's course is rigorous and research-intensive. Apart from that, faculty members are extremely qualified and are always there to assist with course-related or future prospects. Each year, a set of seminars is conducted by the department where distinguished speakers from around the world come to address.

Faculty: The course does a mediocre job at making the students industry-ready, there aren't many courses that give exposure to real industry work. The teachers vary significantly, some are very good and active, while some look like they’re being forced to teach. Exams are not that difficult, but you still need to study daily at least.

Faculty: Faculty members are average, and the curriculum is somewhat old patterned. They are prioritizing the C language over C++, which I think is not recommended. Maybe the curriculum needs an amendment as soon as possible. Hope the admin takes care of it at the earliest. The labs are not that good; you will feel like your school labs are better than this.

Faculty: Faculty members from various branches are united in order to prepare materials for any of the specializations. The head of the department's permission is required to publish and issue the notes and materials to students. The faculty members are phenomenal in their specializations through their teaching methods.

Faculty: Teachers are good and highly qualified, as most are qualified from IIT, and they teach on whiteboards rather than using presentations. The course prepares us for the chemical core, but the job market in chemical engineering in India is not up to the mark. The semester exams are generally medium, as we have cracked JEE, so it seems slightly easier for us.

Faculty: The faculty is pretty good and old. Most of the departments are composed of quite highly qualified professors with specialisation in their fields. Our branch, MCE, has good teachers, from PhD scholars to M.Tech teachers to professors from IITs. The course follows the choice-based credit system, blending rigorous mathematical theory with computer science and finance. Calculus, Real Analysis, Linear Algebra, and Discrete Mathematics. Programming, Data structures, Algorithms, Operating Systems, and...

Faculty: Some of the teachers are very strict while others don't care to take a single class. When you come in the third or fourth year, the course gets lenient. The teachers also do not care to teach, for example, all the students prefer to study from YouTube rather than from their professors. I think exams do not make students industry-ready.