IIIT Una Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: Faculty of the Indian Institute of Information Technology, Una, are well-qualified and passionate about their work. The course curriculum of the college is up to date. Compared to NITs, the relative grading system is preferred, and there is also a 75% attendance criterion. All teachers are very helpful.

Faculty: The faculty of my branch are generally well-qualified holding Ph.D. and M.Tech degree in their domain. They are knowledgeable and approachable and have good relations with students. But I would say our college more focuses on theoretical knowledge than practical.

Faculty: Faculty members are good and very supportive. The exams are to the point and reflect what is taught by faculty members. The students are not overburdened by a lot of homework. Also, we get a lot of spare time to focus on our skills. Overall, it is a good experience.

Faculty: Teachers are well-qualified and knowledgeable. The nature of the teachers to the students is very good. If someone understands the fundamental concepts of this course, then surely he will become industry-ready because the curriculum of this course is more updated than the other colleges. The pass percentage is based on the relative grading, so it is easy for the students to pass the exams.

Faculty: Faculty members are subpar. None of them looks like a professor, and they are not very friendly. Even if you try to talk to them, they just shut down and do nothing. In terms of extracurricular activities, we only have one festival per year; after that, the college is dead. Nothing else happens for the entire year.

Faculty: Teachers are really good, just like in other colleges, but the truth is that you still have to study from YouTube in the end. Yeah, I think the course plan is relevant. Semesters range from easy to moderate, and you can easily score an 8 CGPA if you study one week before the exams speaking from experience. To pass, you need to score 30 marks out of 100 in the end-semester exam.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and all are Ph.D. holders. Teaching quality of teachers is very good and very practical. In the course, subjects have their respective lab section, so these labs enhance the practicality of the subject. Final semester exams are difficult as compared to mid-terms.

Faculty: Faculty members are good and students can approach them in their cabins for any help. Exams are held 3 times per semester. CT1 of 20 marks, CT2 of 20 marks, and end semester of 100 marks. Apart from them, practicals have around 40-50% weightage in the final results. The curriculum is up to date and gets an update every year as per needs.

Faculty: Teachers are well qualified. Teaching quality is good. Teachers are quite helpful. The course curriculum is definitely relevant but some subjects are there which I don't find relevant at all like - UHV and Environment Science and Chemistry. Semester exams are not that difficult at all. Any average student can pass the exams without any difficulty. Pass percentage is above 90%.

Faculty: The faculty is pretty much educated here; most of them have Ph.D. in their subjects. The teaching quality is good. Some teachers do give effort, some don't. The curriculum is one of the most advanced in India. It prepares you well for life outside the campus. The pass percentage is 95 percent, and the difficulty is moderate.

Faculty: From this batch, the exam pattern has changed, which is good for students. From this curriculum, students may focus on their skills, as from this year, the exam pattern is like one mid-semester and one end-semester exam and 2-unit tests, which may be decided by teachers. Teachers are good, qualified, and knowledgeable persons. Every teacher is extremely good in their subject, and they are supportive.

Faculty: Some faculty members are knowledgeable and some are good but overall everyone is quite good at something. Everyone is master of something and one can't deny this fact. Teachers are helpful and qualified and well teaching qaulity is not up to the mark as one would expect but still okay about relevancy of course. I can say that it is somewhat relevant but not as much as one would expect it. It somewhat makes students industry-ready, but to be completely ready one must prepare themselves. Exams are...

Faculty: The B.Tech program curriculum is well-designed, updated, and relevant for the students. The college exams are easy to pass due to the average system used. The evaluation of exams is based on a relatively grading system, which is awesome. The calendar for the academic year is always fixed and does not change. The student-teacher ratio stands at approximately 15:1. The quality of teaching is above average. The college also invites faculty for different guest lectures.

Faculty: Some faculty members are good, but some are not good at teaching. Although the content covered is up to the mark for good placements and skill development, obviously, a student has to work hard on their own for the skills taught in the course. The curriculum is relevant as of now. The semester exams are medium difficult and not very easy; it depends on the faculty too.

Faculty: Our college follows a strict curriculum and a strict 75% attendance policy. All the faculty members are well qualified and are Ph.D. holders. Many are foreigners, but they will not give you as much importance as any other college. But staff and lab assistants are quite helpful and help us to demonstrate and perform experiments properly. Semester exams had a relatively simple marking scheme and are quite easy and mostly questions come from the PPT provided by the teachers.