Dividend distribution tax (DDT) is a type of tax levied on the amount of dividends distributed by a company to its shareholders. This tax falls under the category of corporate taxes, implying that the company, not the shareholders, bears the financial burden. The primary objective of DDT is to ensure that dividends undergo taxation at least once.
The provisions for DDT were embedded in the Income Tax Act, 1961. Section 115-O of the Act dealt with the taxation of distributed profits, i.e. DDT. This was part of the comprehensive structure of the Act, which includes various forms of taxation, including corporate tax, personal income tax, and others.
What is Dividend Distribution Tax?
Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) is a tax imposed on the amount of dividends distributed by a company to its shareholders. It is intended to ensure that dividends are taxed at least once, as companies could potentially avoid paying taxes on their profits by simply distributing them to shareholders as dividends.
In India, DDT was levied at a rate of 15% on dividends paid by domestic companies to their shareholders. This tax was abolished as per the Finance Act 2020. Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) was introduced to streamline the taxation process on distributed profits and ensure tax collection at the corporate level. Abolition of DDT happened due to the following reasons:
- Preventing Tax Evasion: Before DDT, dividends were taxed in the hands of the recipients (shareholders). However, this system had a risk of tax evasion, as not all recipients declared their dividend income. Taxing dividends at the source ensured that tax on dividend income was collected uniformly.
- Simplification of Tax Collection: Collecting tax from individual shareholders, especially when there are a large number of them, can be logistically challenging and inefficient. DDT simplified this process by imposing the tax liability on the company distributing the dividends, making the process more manageable for the tax authorities.
- Equity Amongst Taxpayers: DDT aimed to bring more equity into the taxation system. High-net-worth individuals (HNIs) who were in the higher income tax brackets benefited disproportionately from the earlier system, as they often received substantial dividend incomes. By taxing dividends at a flat rate at the company level, it was intended to create a more equitable tax structure.
- Double Taxation Avoidance: The introduction of DDT was also to address the issue of double taxation. In many countries, dividends are taxed twice; first as corporate income at the company level and then as income in the hands of shareholders. The implementation of DDT, in some cases, came with provisions or agreements to prevent such double taxation, especially in the context of international investments.
- Fiscal Efficiency: By taxing dividends at the source, governments could secure a stable and predictable source of revenue. This was particularly important in economies where monitoring and collection from individual taxpayers posed significant challenges.
- Encouraging Reinvestment: Another rationale was to encourage companies to reinvest their profits rather than distributing them as dividends. Since dividends were taxed, companies might be more inclined to reinvest earnings into the business, potentially leading to more growth and economic development.
Facts About DDT
- The DDT rate was set at 15% on the gross dividend amount as per Section 115O of the Income Tax Act.
- This resulted in an effective DDT rate of 17.65%, excluding surcharge and cess.
- For dividends under Section 2 (22) (e) of the Income Tax Act, the rate was higher, at 30%
- DDT has been abolished since the year 2020.
Rules Related to DDT
Prior to its abolition in 2020, DDT had rules governing its application and compliance. These rules were part of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and were important for companies declaring and distributing dividends:
- Tax Rate: The DDT was charged at a specific rate, which varied over the years. The rate was usually a percentage of the total amount of dividends declared, distributed, or paid by the company. This rate was inclusive of additional surcharges and cess applicable as per the prevailing tax laws.
- Applicability: DDT was applicable to all domestic companies declaring, distributing, or paying dividends. The tax was levied on the gross amount of dividends.
- Payment Deadline: DDT was required to be paid within 14 days from the date of declaration, distribution, or payment of the dividend, whichever was earliest. Failure to pay within this timeframe attracted interest and penalties.
- Grossing Up of Dividends: For the purpose of calculating DDT, dividends were grossed up. This meant that the tax was calculated on a grossed-up amount, which is the dividend amount before deduction of the DDT.
- Exemptions and Deductions: Certain dividends were exempt from DDT, such as dividends paid to a holding company by its subsidiary. Additionally, there were no deductions or allowances permitted from the dividend amount for the purpose of computing DDT.
- Credit of DDT: The dividends received by shareholders were exempt from tax in their hands to the extent of the DDT paid by the company. This was to avoid double taxation of the same income.
- Interest for Late Payment: In case the company failed to pay DDT within the stipulated deadline, it was liable to pay interest for the delay.
- Filing of Returns and Compliance: Companies were required to file specific forms and returns to declare DDT payment, maintaining compliance with tax regulations.
Explore GST courses
Why was Dividend Distribution Tax abolished?
DDT was abolished due to the following reasons:
- The aim was to revamp Indian tax structure and to boost investments. Due to this reason, dividend distribution tax (DDT), the way in which dividends were taxed was changed.
- Many times, DDT did not allow companies to make wise economic decisions, due to which DDT was abolished to ensure better capital allocation. This leads to efficient capital markets.
- Due to the shift in the way of taxing dividends, the shareholders were able to enhance the transparency of tax collection.
- This abolishment helped in increasing investable funds within the reach of domestic individual investors that helped with market investments.
- Through this, the abolition helped in bringing India's tax regime in line with global practices of taxing the dividends in the hands of recipients.
After its abolition, dividends were taxed in the hands of shareholders instead of companies paying DDT. Shareholders pay tax on dividend income as per their individual tax slabs.
You can also read: