Landmark Judgements & Important Cases for Law Entrance Exam Preparation

For the AIBE 2025 exam, it is important to understand the landmark judgments. These cases play an important role in shaping country's legal framework and holds high importance for lawyers in the country. Read further to know more.

Landmark Judgements for AIBE Exam 2025 with Analysis

AIBE 20 Exam 2025 is expected to be conducted in December. But the BCI has not announced the  AIBE 20 Exam Date 2025 yet. AIBE Exam 2025 will be conducted in pen-and-paper mode. Read further to know some of the top landmark judgments that are important for AIBE (All India Bar Examination) preparation. These cases cover a important topics, like constitutional law, criminal law, contract law, family law, and mor. These are mostly asked in entrance exams like CLAT, MHCET Law, and others too. Hence, aspirants must read it carefully.

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)

The Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case remains one of the most important judgments of Indian constitutional law. It helped to establish a balance of power between the legislature and the judiciary. It ensured that even Parliament cannot override the Constitution’s foundational principles. The Kesavananda Bharati Case continues to protect the Constitution’s core values.

Also Read: All India Bar Exam 2025: How to fill AIBE 20 OMR Sheet?

• Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)

The case is an important judgement for the evolution of Indian constitutional law. It has increased the scope of personal liberty under Article 21 and introduced the concept of due process. It ensured that the state's actions affecting individual rights must be reasonable. The case has shaped the judicial approach toward fundamental rights. It continues to be cited in many judgments that deal with personal liberty, judicial review, and procedural fairness.

Also Read: Judicial Service Exams 2025: State-wise exam pattern, Syllabus, Eligibility Criteria, Prelims, Mains

• Marbury v. Madison (1803) (US Case with Indian Influence)

The case laid down the crucial principle of judicial review. It established that the judiciary as the final arbiter on the constitutionality of laws and executive actions. This principle is directly valid for our country, where the SC has similar powers to review. Judicial review in both the US and in our country ensures that the rule of law is followed. 

• Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967)

The case was a critical moment in the history of Indian constitutional law. It limited Parliament's power to amend the Fundamental Rights. While Golaknath Case restricted the amending power, the 24th Amendment and subsequent rulings slowly restored it. It also clarified the relationship between constitutional amendments and the protection of Fundamental Rights in India.

Also Read: AIBE 20 Books: Top 10 Topic-wise AIBE Preparation Books

• Shah Bano Case (Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum) (1985)

The Shah Bano case was a landmark judgment in the history of Indian law, marking a significant victory for women’s rights, especially in the context of maintenance after divorce. While the ruling was met with political controversy, it underscored the need for secular laws to ensure equality and justice for women, irrespective of their religious background. The case sparked important debates on the relationship between personal laws and secular laws, and while the Muslim Women's Act (1986) reversed the Court’s judgment, the case remains an important precedent in gender justice and the application of secular law in India.

• Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997)

The case stands as a important turning point in the fight against sexual harassment in the country. It made sure that sexual harassment at the workplace was no longer a hidden issue and that employers had a duty to provide a safe and respectful environment for their employees. The SC judgment in this case made further legal reforms and empowered women to speak for their rights in the workplace. The Vishaka Guidelines is a significant milestone in country's legal history concerning gender equality and workplace safety.

• Sabarimala Case (Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala, 2018)

This case speaks about the struggle for gender equality in our country especially for women to workship in religious places. It wa a fight against discrimation in the religious spaces when it comes to women. It ensureed that constitutional principles such as equality, freedom, and dignity prevailed over discriminatory practices based on gender.
Also Read:   Sabarimala Case (Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala, 2018) 

• State of Rajasthan v. Union of India (1977)

The State of Rajasthan v. Union of India case (1977) is an important decision taken in India in context of financial federalism. The Apex Court judgement reinforced the government's authority to allocate and regulate the financial resources to the states. This case remains a landmark in understanding the complex relationship between the Union and States in the context of fiscal policies and the distribution of resources.
For the AIBE exam, it is important to know these landmark judgments. Ensure you read the full judgments, understand it and practice applying them to case scenarios to maximise your chances of success in the exam.

Read More:

• AIBE Previous Year Question Papers (GUJARATI) with Answers : Download For Free
• AIBE Mock Test 2025: Download Free PDFs, Hindi & Gujarati Sample Paper with Answer