Landmark Judgements & Important Cases for AIBE Preparation

For the AIBE 2026 exam, studying the landmark judgments will help to score well. These cases have shaped the legal framework in the country. Read on for the list of caselaws. 

Landmark Judgements for AIBE Exam 2026 with Analysis

The Bar Council of India will conduct the AIBE 21 Exam 2026 on June 7, 2026. The AIBE Exam 2026 will be conducted in pen-and-paper mode. The candidates looking to sit for the exam must have a thorough understanding of the topics to be asked in the test, along with major landmark judgments. Candidates can fill out the AIBE Application Form until April 30, 2026. 

Read further to know some of the top landmark judgments that are a must for AIBE preparation. These cases cover topics like constitutional law, criminal law, contract law, family law, and more. These are mostly asked in exams like CLAT, MHCET Law, and others. Hence, aspirants must read it carefully.

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala

The Kesavananda Bharati Judgement, also known as Basic Structure Doctrine Case is known to be one of the most significant constitutional law cases in India. Every Law student or those aspiring to study Law must know this landmark judgement and understand its significance. This case highlights that the Parliament has power to amend the Indian Constitution but the power to alter its fundamental framework or basic features is limited. 

Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India

The case is a major judgement for the evolution of Indian constitutional law. It has increased the scope of personal liberty under Article 21 and introduced the concept of due process. It ensured that the state's actions affecting individual rights must be reasonable. 

Shah Bano Case

It marked a significant victory for women’s rights in the context of maintenance after divorce. The case sparked debates on the relationship between personal laws and secular laws. The case remains major in gender justice and the application of secular law in India.

Sabarimala Case

This case speaks about the struggle for gender equality for women to worship in religious places. It was a fight against discrimination. It made sure that constitutional principles such as equality, freedom, and dignity prevailed over discriminatory practices based on gender.

State of Rajasthan v. Union of India

It is a major decision taken in relation to financial federalism. The court order forced the government's authority to allocate and regulate the financial resources to the states. 

Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan Case

The judgment in Vishaka and Others vs. State of Rajasthan (1997) stands as a landmark judgement in the country's legal history. The judgment must be known by not only every law student but also every citizen who wants the gender justice. 

Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967) Case

Golaknath case was decided in 1967 by the Supreme Court of India. Many legislations passed by the Government violated the Right to Property (Article 31) and other Fundamental Rights. Such amendments were challenged in this case. It then became the milestone case.

Indira Sawhney v Union of India

Indira Sawhney's judgment laid down the guidelines to be followed while implementing the reservation policy. The Mandal Commission case contributed to proposing the scope and extent of constitutional validity of 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs).

Sarla Mudgal Case

This case highlighted the issue of Hindu man converting to the Islam. This practice was prevalent when men used to illegally dissolve their marriage. The court ruled this act as illegal. This Judgment highlighted the need for Uniform Civil Code. 

Read More:

• AIBE Previous Year Question Papers (GUJARATI) with Answers: Download For Free
• AIBE Mock Test: Download Free PDFs, Hindi & Gujarati Sample Paper with Answer