NMC Proposes 3-Year Rotatory Headship for Medical College Departments, Invites Stakeholder Feedback

The NMC is now seeking feedback from stakeholders, with a deadline set for submissions in mid-July 2025. NMC has also Adds M.S. Traumatology and Surgery as Feeder for M.Ch. Neurosurgery, Plastic Surgery Courses

The National Medical Commission (NMC), India’s apex regulatory body for medical education, has unveiled a significant proposal to amend the Postgraduate Medical Education Regulations (PGMER) 2023.

The draft, titled "Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations (Amendment), 2025," introduces a rotatory headship system for medical college departments and expands eligibility for super-specialty courses.

Rotatory Headship: A Shift in Leadership Structure

One of the cornerstone proposals is the introduction of a three-year rotatory headship for department heads in medical colleges. Under the existing 2023 regulations, each department is led by a professor appointed as the Head of Department (HoD). The new amendment seeks to change this by mandating that the HoD position rotates every three years among eligible faculty members, specifically professors and associate professors who qualify for promotion to professor based on seniority and possession of a postgraduate medical degree.

This move aims to address long-standing concerns in medical institutions about stagnant leadership and the concentration of administrative power among a few senior faculty members. By implementing a rotational system, the NMC intends to promote fairness, encourage diverse perspectives in departmental governance, and provide opportunities for younger, qualified faculty to take on leadership roles. The proposal has been described as a response to demands from faculty associations and academic bodies for more equitable administrative structures.

For instance, the rotation will ensure that associate professors with significant experience and those on the cusp of promotion are not perpetually sidelined. The NMC has emphasized that eligibility will be strictly based on seniority within the department and academic qualifications, ensuring transparency in the selection process. However, the draft does not specify how disputes over seniority or eligibility will be resolved, which may be a point of contention during the feedback phase.

Expansion of Feeder Qualifications for Super-Specialty Courses

In addition to the headship reform, the NMC has proposed including M.S. (Traumatology and Surgery) as a feeder broad specialty qualification for several super-specialty courses, such as M.Ch. in Neurosurgery, M.Ch. in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and other M.Ch. programs. This follows a decision by the Postgraduate Medical Education Board (PGMEB) earlier in 2025 to provisionally allow PG degree holders in Traumatology and Surgery to appear for the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test Super Specialty (NEET-SS) 2024.

This inclusion is expected to broaden access to super-specialty training, particularly for doctors specializing in trauma care, a critical area given India’s high burden of road traffic accidents and injuries. By recognizing Traumatology and Surgery as a feeder qualification, the NMC aims to align medical education with evolving healthcare needs, ensuring that specialists in high-demand fields can pursue advanced training. The move has been welcomed by trauma surgeons, who have long advocated for greater recognition of their specialty in super-specialty pathways.

Stakeholder Feedback and Potential Implications

The NMC’s call for feedback underscores its commitment to participatory policymaking. Stakeholders, including medical colleges, faculty associations, and individual doctors, have until mid-July 2025 to submit their comments. The NMC has encouraged detailed inputs, particularly on the feasibility of the rotatory headship system and the inclusion of new feeder qualifications. Feedback can be submitted via the NMC’s official portal or through designated channels outlined in the Gazette notification.

The proposed changes could have far-reaching implications for medical education in India. The rotatory headship system may enhance departmental efficiency by bringing fresh leadership perspectives, but it could also face resistance from senior professors accustomed to long-term control. Additionally, the rotational model may require robust mechanisms to ensure smooth transitions and maintain academic continuity. For instance, departments with limited eligible faculty could struggle to implement the three-year rotation, potentially necessitating exemptions or alternative arrangements.

The expansion of feeder qualifications is likely to increase the pool of candidates for super-specialty programs, but it may also strain existing training infrastructure. Medical colleges will need to ensure adequate faculty and resources to accommodate the influx of trainees, particularly in resource-constrained institutions.

Broader Context: NMC’s Ongoing Reforms

These proposals are part of the NMC’s broader efforts to modernize medical education in India. In recent months, the commission has introduced several reforms, including a national ranking system for PG medical colleges, a facial recognition-based attendance system linked to Aadhaar, and relaxed eligibility criteria for faculty promotions. The NMC has also cracked down on non-compliant institutions, issuing show-cause notices to colleges with faculty shortages or irregular attendance.

The rotatory headship proposal aligns with the NMC’s goal of fostering transparency and accountability in medical education. By decentralizing leadership and promoting inclusivity, the NMC aims to create a more dynamic academic environment that supports both faculty development and student learning.

Reactions and Next Steps

Initial reactions from the medical community, as seen in posts on X, suggest cautious optimism. Some faculty members have hailed the rotational HoD system as a “long-overdue reform” that will democratize leadership, while others have raised concerns about its practical implementation, particularly in smaller departments. The inclusion of Traumatology and Surgery as a feeder qualification has been broadly supported, with trauma specialists viewing it as a step toward greater recognition of their field.

As the feedback period progresses, the NMC is expected to hold consultations with key stakeholders, including the Indian Medical Association (IMA), medical college administrations, and faculty unions. The final version of the amended regulations, incorporating stakeholder inputs, is likely to be notified later in 2025, with implementation expected in the 2026 academic year.

The NMC’s latest proposals mark a bold step toward reforming India’s medical education system. If implemented effectively, the rotatory headship and expanded feeder qualifications could enhance the quality and inclusivity of medical training, ultimately benefiting both healthcare professionals and patients across the country. However, the success of these reforms will depend on the NMC’s ability to address stakeholder concerns and ensure robust support for their execution.

Read more:

• NEET PG 2025 Revised Schedule Out @natboard.edu.in; Exam City Selection Window Opens on June 13
• NEET PG 2025 Cannot Be Held in Two Shifts: SC Directs NBE to Conduct Single Shift Exam